AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poortman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hamming, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poortman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hamming, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 181:1355-1359
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Comparison of CT and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Blinded Prospective Study

Pieter Poortman1, Paul N. M. Lohle2, Cees M. C. Schoemaker2, Henk J. M. Oostvogel1, Hans J. L. J. M. Teepen3, Klaas A. H. Zwinderman4 and Jaap F. Hamming1

1 Department of Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Radiology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands.
3 Department of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands.
4 Department of Medical Statistics, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of CT and sonography in a general community teaching hospital for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this prospective study, 199 consecutive patients with clinical signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis were examined with sonography (graded compression technique) and CT (focused unenhanced single-detector helical CT [5-mm section thickness]. CT was performed from the L2 vertebral body to the pubic symphysis, and no patients were given oral, rectal, or IV contrast medium. The primary sonographic criterion for diagnosing acute appendicitis was an incompressible appendix with a transverse outer diameter of 6 mm or larger with incompressible periappendicular inflamed fat with or without an appendicolith. The primary CT criterion for diagnosing acute appendicitis was the identification of an appendix with a transverse outer diameter of 6 mm or larger with associated periappendiceal inflammatory changes. The results, independently reported, were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings.

RESULTS. One hundred thirty-two patients had acute appendicitis at surgery, and 67 patients did not. The sensitivity of CT and sonography was 76% and 79%, respectively; the specificity was 83% and 78%; the accuracy was 78% and 78%; the positive predictive value was 90% and 87%; and the negative predictive value was 64% and 65%.

CONCLUSION. Unenhanced focused single-detector helical CT and graded compression sonography performed in a general community teaching hospital by both body imaging radiologists and general radiology staff members have a similar accuracy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. van Randen, S. Bipat, A. H. Zwinderman, D. T. Ubbink, J. Stoker, and M. A. Boermeester
Acute Appendicitis: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT and Graded Compression US Related to Prevalence of Disease
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 97 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Gaitini, N. Beck-Razi, D. Mor-Yosef, D. Fischer, O. B. Itzhak, M. M. Krausz, and A. Engel
Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Accuracy of Color Doppler Sonography and MDCT Compared with Surgery and Clinical Follow-Up
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1300 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Pinto Leite, J. M. Pereira, R. Cunha, P. Pinto, and C. Sirlin
CT Evaluation of Appendicitis and Its Complications: Imaging Techniques and Key Diagnostic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 406 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Keyzer, M. Zalcman, V. De Maertelaer, E. Coppens, M.-A. Bali, P. A. Gevenois, and D. Van Gansbeke
Comparison of US and Unenhanced Multi-Detector Row CT in Patients Suspected of having Acute Appendicitis
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. Terasawa, C. C. Blackmore, S. Bent, and R. J. Kohlwes
Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents
Ann Intern Med, October 5, 2004; 141(7): 537 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. S. Katz, M. Jain, M. J. Lane, E. M. Meiner, S. Bhalla, C. O. Menias, and C. M. Rucker
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S28 - S33.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.