AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Hoe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderheyden, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Hoe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderheyden, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:95-100
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Value of Different MRI Techniques for Prediction of Functional Recovery After Revascularization

Lieven Van Hoe1 and Marc Vanderheyden2

1 Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
2 Cardiovascular Center, Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the value of different MRI techniques for the assessment of myocardial viability.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eighteen infarct patients (mean age ± SD, 62 ± 8 years) with myocardial ischemia were examined using MRI before and after revascularization. The MRI study before treatment consisted of an evaluation of first-pass perfusion, contractile function at rest and during dobutamine stress, and delayed hyperenhancement. Findings were correlated with segmental and global cardiac function after revascularization.

RESULTS. In initially dysfunctional segments, the likelihood of functional recovery after revascularization was 91% for segments without delayed hyperenhancement, 43% for segments with delayed hyperenhancement with transmural extent of 75% or less, and 8% for segments with delayed hyperenhancement with transmural extent of more than 75% (p < 0.05). Improved function at dobutamine stress MRI indicated functional recovery in 87%, whereas functional recovery was observed in only 30% of segments not responding at dobutamine stress MRI (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the results of first-pass perfusion MRI and functional recovery. The ejection fraction after revascularization was best predicted by the MRI-derived infarct volume (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.63).

CONCLUSION. A simple protocol consisting of baseline contractility and delayed enhancement MRI studies is adequate to differentiate dysfunctional but viable from nonviable myocardium. Dobutamine stress and perfusion MRI studies offer little or no additional information.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, U. S. Valeti, P. A. Araoz, and A. S. Jaffe
The quantification of infarct size
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1533 - 1542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.