|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Radiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical
Center, One Medical Center Dr., Lebanon, NH 03756.
2 Skirball InstituteNYU Medical Center, 540 First Ave., New York, NY
10016.
3 Millennium Technology Inc., 465-5600 Parkwood Way, Richmond, BC, Canada.
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Rehabilitation, UMass Memorial
Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave. N, Worchester, MA 01655.
5 National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, 1260 S Eliseo Dr., Greenbrae, CA
94904.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to describe the structural organization of the extracellular matrix of articular cartilage of the tibial plateau and its influence on MRI appearance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Spin-echo images of 11 resected tibial plateaus acquired at 7 T were compared with the structure of the extracellular matrix as shown by fracture sectioning the samples in the plane of imaging. Four samples were scanned at two different orientations relative to the main magnetic field (B0). T2 maps were acquired in two orientations on three of these four samples.
RESULTS. On the basis of the presence of reproducible regional variations in the shape of the matrix, a characteristic matrix architecture was described. The location of peak signal intensity and T2 on MRI correlated with the level at which the matrix was estimated to be aligned at approximately 55° to B0 (r = 0.91). This correlation of matrix orientation relative to B0 with T2 and signal intensity on MRI was not altered by regional variations in the shape of the matrix or by imaging samples at two different orientations.
CONCLUSION. The structure of the extracellular matrix, through its orientation-dependent influence on T2 decay, exerts a strong influence on the MRI appearance of cartilage. At the tibial plateau, a characteristic matrix architecture is associated with an equally characteristic MRI appearance.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. M. White, M. S. Sussman, M. Hurtig, L. Probyn, G. Tomlinson, and R. Kandel Cartilage T2 Assessment: Differentiation of Normal Hyaline Cartilage and Reparative Tissue after Arthroscopic Cartilage Repair in Equine Subjects. Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Potter and L. F. Foo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Trauma, Degeneration, and Repair Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 661 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Recht, D. W. Goodwin, C. S. Winalski, and L. M. White MRI of Articular Cartilage: Revisiting Current Status and Future Directions Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 899 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |