HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crim, J. R. Articles by Kjeldsberg, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Crim, J. R. Articles by Kjeldsberg, K. M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Radiographic Diagnosis of Tarsal Coalition

¹ Both authors: 1A71 School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2140.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of unenhanced radiographic diagnosis of tarsal coalition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study had two phases. The first was a retrospective case and control review. Radiographs of 37 feet (15 talocalcaneal coalitions and 15 calcaneonavicular coalitions) and of 17 patients with foot pain and no coalition used as controls were reviewed independently by three observers who had no prior knowledge of the cases. Each observer reviewed the cases for individual signs of coalition and then decided if coalition was present. The second phase of the study was a prospective evaluation by a single observer of 150 consecutive weightbearing foot radiographs obtained to evaluate nontraumatic foot pain. Patients diagnosed as positive for coalition underwent CT.

RESULTS. On retrospective review of unenhanced radiographs, observers achieved 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity in the diagnosis of talocalcaneal coalitions. Sensitivity and specificity for calcaneonavicular coalitions ranged from 80% to 100% and 97% to 98%, respectively. Several previously unpublished radiographic signs increased sensitivity of diagnosis. For calcaneonavicular coalition, the new signs were altered navicular morphology and visualization of the bar on the anteroposterior radiograph. For talocalcaneal coalition, the new signs were a dysmorphic sustentaculum tali, nonvisualization of the middle subtalar facet, and shortening of the talar neck. In the prospective phase of the study, three talocalcaneal coalitions were detected with no false-positive results.

CONCLUSION. Routine anteroposterior and lateral unenhanced radiographs are a valuable screening tool for tarsal coalition, even when used by inexperienced observers. The newly described signs increase sensitivity of radiographic diagnosis.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. M. Chapman The Anteater Nose Sign Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 604 - 605. [Full Text] [PDF]