AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schnall, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schnall, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:473-480
© American Roentgen Ray Society


MRI Before Reexcision Surgery in Patients with Breast Cancer

Janie M. Lee1,2, Susan G. Orel1, Brian J. Czerniecki3, Lawrence J. Solin4 and Mitchell D. Schnall1

1 Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
2 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Institute of Technology Assessment, 101 Merrimac St., 10th Fl., Boston, MA 02214.
3 Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

OBJECTIVE. The aims of this study were to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in evaluating patients for residual cancer, identify the prevalence of multicentric or multifocal disease, and evaluate the impact of MRI on surgical treatment planning.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Of 101 potentially eligible patients, 80 candidates for breast conservation therapy who had primary breast cancer in 82 breasts diagnosed by excisional biopsy with close or positive margins were included in the study group. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced MRI before further surgery and subsequently underwent either reexcision lumpectomy or mastectomy with histopathologic correlation.

RESULTS. Residual carcinoma, either invasive or in situ, was present in 59.8% of the breasts. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting residual disease were 61.2% and 69.7%, respectively. Twenty-three additional lesions distant from the biopsy site were identified in 19 breasts, and 18 suspicious lesions underwent biopsy. Histology results indicated that six lesions were malignant, so the overall prevalence was 7.3%. The positive predictive value of identifying an additional suspicious lesion was 33.3%. In 24 breasts, MRI changed which procedure would be performed next from reexcision lumpectomy to mastectomy (n = 9), biopsy of an additional lesion in the ipsilateral (n = 12) or contralateral (n = 2) breast, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1). Approximately 25% of the breasts underwent mastectomy as definitive surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION. Overlap in the appearances of benign and malignant lesions limits MRI evaluation for residual disease. MRI can show additional suspicious lesions that are likely to be multicentric or multifocal disease. These findings changed the original treatment plan for approximately 30% of breasts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. E. Brennan, N. Houssami, S. Lord, P. Macaskill, L. Irwig, J. M. Dixon, R. M.L. Warren, and S. Ciatto
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of the Contralateral Breast in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incremental Cancer Detection and Impact on Surgical Management
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2009; 27(33): 5640 - 5649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Katipamula, A. C. Degnim, T. Hoskin, J. C. Boughey, C. Loprinzi, C. S. Grant, K. R. Brandt, S. Pruthi, C. G. Chute, J. E. Olson, et al.
Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2009; 27(25): 4082 - 4088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. C. Genson, C. E. Blane, M. A. Helvie, S. A. Waits, and T. L. Chenevert
Effects on Breast MRI of Artifacts Caused by Metallic Tissue Marker Clips
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 372 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
S. K. Shah, S. K. Shah, and K. V. Greatrex
Current Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Imaging: A Primer for the Primary Care Physician
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 478 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. A. Newman and H. M. Kuerer
Advances in Breast Conservation Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1685 - 1697.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.