AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hellström, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lasson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hellström, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lasson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:631-638
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Extracolonic and Incidental Findings on CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)

Mikael Hellström1, Maria H. Svensson1 and Anders Lasson2,3

1 Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg 413 45, Sweden.
2 Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg 413 45, Sweden.
3 Department of Medicine, Borås Hospital, Borås 501 82, Sweden.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to prospectively determine the frequency and clinical importance of extracolonic findings on CT colonography in symptomatic patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred eleven symptomatic patients referred for colonoscopy underwent CT colonography before colonoscopy. Helical CT from the diaphragm to the symphysis was performed with the patient in the supine and prone positions after rectal air insufflation. Image interpretation was done on a digital workstation. Extracolonic findings were classified as minor, moderate, or major according to potential clinical importance. Patient records, with a follow-up time of about 3 years, were reviewed to determine final diagnoses.

RESULTS. Twenty-six (23%) of the patients had CT findings of major importance such as lymphadenopathy (n = 7), aortic aneurysm (n = 6), suspected solid hepatic masses (n = 5), and suspected solid renal masses (n = 4). Fifty-eight patients (52%) had findings of moderate importance such as gallstones (n = 16), indeterminate renal masses (n = 9), adrenal masses with benign appearance (n = 8), and hiatal hernia (n = 7). Forty-six patients (41%) had no or only minor findings, such as renal cysts (n = 34), renal calcifications (n = 19), and hepatic cysts (n = 14). Review of patient records showed that CT colonography contributed to the detection of major, previously unknown extracolonic disorders in 14 (13%) of the 111 patients.

CONCLUSION. Potentially important extracolonic findings were revealed in 23% of the patients, leading to additional diagnostic or therapeutic considerations. Some of these findings were clinically important, whereas others were previously known or led to unnecessary workup. This finding must be taken into account when CT colonography is considered for routine diagnostic workup or screening.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. D. Johnson
CT Colonography: Coming of Age
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1239 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
M H Liedenbaum, A F van Rijn, A H de Vries, H M Dekker, M Thomeer, C J van Marrewijk, L Hol, M G W Dijkgraaf, P Fockens, P M M Bossuyt, et al.
Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening
Gut, September 1, 2009; 58(9): 1242 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. J. Pickhardt, M. E. Hanson, D. J. Vanness, J. Y. Lo, D. H. Kim, A. J. Taylor, T. C. Winter, and J. L. Hinshaw
Unsuspected Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Clinical and Economic Impact
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 151 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. D. Johnson, M.-H. Chen, A. Y. Toledano, J. P. Heiken, A. Dachman, M. D. Kuo, C. O. Menias, B. Siewert, J. I. Cheema, R. G. Obregon, et al.
Accuracy of CT Colonography for Detection of Large Adenomas and Cancers
N. Engl. J. Med., September 18, 2008; 359(12): 1207 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
J K Turner and J Green
Iron deficiency anaemia guidelines: time for an update?
Gut, September 1, 2008; 57(9): 1330 - 1331.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
S. M. Wolf
Introduction: the challenge of incidental findings.
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 216 - 218.
[PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
H. S. Richardson
Incidental findings and ancillary-care obligations.
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 256 - 270.
[PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
H. Siddiki, J. G. Fletcher, B. McFarland, N. Dajani, N. Orme, B. Koenig, M. Strobel, and S. M. Wolf
Incidental Findings in CT Colonography: Literature Review and Survey of Current Research Practice.
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 320 - 331.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Glockner
Incidental Findings on Renal MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 693 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Bruzzi, M. T. Truong, E. M. Marom, O. Mawlawi, D. A. Podoloff, H. A. Macapinlac, and R. F. Munden
Incidental Findings on Integrated PET/CT That Do Not Accumulate 18F-FDG
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1116 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Davila, C. D. Johnson, T. R. Behrenbeck, T. L. Hoskin, and W. S. Harmsen
Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Status at CT Colonography.
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 110 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. J. Pickhardt and A. J. Taylor
Extracolonic Findings Identified in Asymptomatic Adults at Screening CT Colonography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 718 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. D. Furtado, D. A. Aguirre, C. B. Sirlin, D. Dang, S. K. Stamato, P. Lee, F. Sani, M. A. Brown, D. L. Levin, and G. Casola
Whole-Body CT Screening: Spectrum of Findings and Recommendations in 1192 Patients
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 385 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C S Ng and A H Freeman
Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 78(925): 20 - 21.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T Xiong, M Richardson, R Woodroffe, S Halligan, D Morton, and R J Lilford
Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 78(925): 22 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.