AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boiselle, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boiselle, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:757-759
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

High-Resolution CT Using MDCT: Comparison of Degree of Motion Artifact Between Volumetric and Axial Methods

D. M. Kelly1, I. Hasegawa1, R. Borders2, H. Hatabu1 and P. M. Boiselle1

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
2 The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of motion artifact on high-resolution CT images obtained using volumetric and axial (nonvolumetric) CT methods.

CONCLUSION. Volumetric high-resolution CT is associated with significantly greater motion artifact compared with axial noncontiguous high-resolution imaging.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. d. Bastos, E. Y. Lee, K. J. Strauss, D. Zurakowski, D. A. Tracy, and P. M. Boiselle
Motion Artifact on High-Resolution CT Images of Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Volumetric and Axial CT Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1414 - 1418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E J CHOI, Y-W OH, S Y HAM, K Y LEE, and E-Y KANG
Comparison between coronal reformatted images and direct coronal CT images of the swine lung specimen: assessment of image quality with 64-detector row CT
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2008; 81(966): 463 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
U. Studler, T. Gluecker, G. Bongartz, J. Roth, and W. Steinbrich
Image Quality from High-Resolution CT of the Lung: Comparison of Axial Scans and of Sections Reconstructed from Volumetric Data Acquired Using MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 602 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Gralla, F. Spycher, C. Pignolet, C. Ozdoba, P. Vock, and H. Hoppe
Evaluation of a 16-MDCT Scanner in an Emergency Department: Initial Clinical Experience and Workflow Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 232 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.