|
|
||||||||
Original Report |
1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard
Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
2 The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of motion artifact on high-resolution CT images obtained using volumetric and axial (nonvolumetric) CT methods.
CONCLUSION. Volumetric high-resolution CT is associated with significantly greater motion artifact compared with axial noncontiguous high-resolution imaging.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. d. Bastos, E. Y. Lee, K. J. Strauss, D. Zurakowski, D. A. Tracy, and P. M. Boiselle Motion Artifact on High-Resolution CT Images of Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Volumetric and Axial CT Methods Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1414 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E J CHOI, Y-W OH, S Y HAM, K Y LEE, and E-Y KANG Comparison between coronal reformatted images and direct coronal CT images of the swine lung specimen: assessment of image quality with 64-detector row CT Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2008; 81(966): 463 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Studler, T. Gluecker, G. Bongartz, J. Roth, and W. Steinbrich Image Quality from High-Resolution CT of the Lung: Comparison of Axial Scans and of Sections Reconstructed from Volumetric Data Acquired Using MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 602 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gralla, F. Spycher, C. Pignolet, C. Ozdoba, P. Vock, and H. Hoppe Evaluation of a 16-MDCT Scanner in an Emergency Department: Initial Clinical Experience and Workflow Analysis Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 232 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |