AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lam, W. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lam, W. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, T. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:1069-1074
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Sonographic Appearance of Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast

W. W. M. Lam1, W. C. W. Chu1, G. M. Tse2 and T. K. Ma2

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Ngan Shing St., Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
2 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sonographic and mammographic features of mucinous carcinoma and to correlate the imaging features with two histologic classifications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two radiologists analyzed the mammographic and sonographic features of 33 mucinous carcinomas. Mammographic features according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and sonographic features were recorded and analyzed. The imaging features of the mass were correlated with the nuclear grade and mucin content of these 33 mucinous carcinomas. The incidence of axillary lymph nodes metastasis in different histologic grades and their detection by imaging were also assessed.

RESULTS. As many as 21.2% (7/33) of mucinous carcinomas could not be detected mammographically. When they were detected mammographically, more than 92% of the tumors presented as a mass, either oval or lobular. Microlobulations were present in 38.5% of these lesions. The margin of the lesion as seen on mammography can be used to predict the histologic grade. A circumscribed margin was associated with a favorable histologic grade (p = 0.01), whereas an indistinct margin was more commonly associated with the mixed type of lesion (p = 0.05). Sonographically, mixed cystic and solid components, distal enhancement, and microlobulated margins were commonly found in mucinous carcinomas, with an incidence of 37.5%, 43.8%, and 56.3%, respectively. Homogeneity on sonography was associated with the pure type of mucinous carcinoma and hence a better prognosis. Sonography showed a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 89%, positive predictive value of 60%, negative predictive value of 84%, and accuracy of 79.2% in the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSION. Both sonographic and mammographic assessments are important in the correct diagnosis of mucinous carcinoma, the prediction of histologic grade, and the prognosis of the tumors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Shin, B.-K. Han, E. Y. Ko, Y. H. Choe, and S.-J. Nam
Probably Benign Breast Masses Diagnosed by Sonography: Is There a Difference in the Cancer Rate According to Palpability?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): W187 - W191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey
Unusual Breast Cancers: Useful Clues to Expanding the Differential Diagnosis
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 683 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Bernathova, B. Zelger, D. Deardon, and G. Bodner
Sonographic findings of an intraductal mucinous carcinoma.
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2006; 25(7): 925 - 927.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.