AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cody, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Eftekhari, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cody, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Eftekhari, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:849-859
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Strategies for Formulating Appropriate MDCT Techniques When Imaging the Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis in Pediatric Patients

Dianna D. Cody1, Donna M. Moxley1, Kerry T. Krugh1,2, Jennifer C. O'Daniel3, Louis K. Wagner4 and Farzin Eftekhari1

1 Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 56, Houston, TX 77030.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, The Toledo Hospital, 2142 N Cove Blvd., Toledo, OH 43606.
3 Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.
4 Department of Radiology, University of Texas Medical School, 6431 Fannin St., MSB 2.100, Houston, TX 77030.

OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to formulate appropriate MDCT chest and abdominopelvic CT scan protocols for pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Surface radiation dose measurements from a set of anthropomorphic phantoms (nominal 1 year old, 5 year old, and 10 year old) and an adult phantom were compared with standard CT dose index measurements. Image-noise values on axial 5-mm-thick anthropomorphic phantom images were obtained as a measure of image quality.

RESULTS. Peripheral CT dose index values obtained with the standard 16-cm acrylic phantom were within approximately 10% of the CT surface dose measurements for the pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms for both chest and abdominopelvic scan protocols. The noise value for the adult phantom image acquired using a typical clinical CT technique was identified, and targeting this level of noise for pediatric CT examinations resulted in a decrease in dose of 60–90%. Initially, 80 kVp was selected for use with very small children; however, beam-hardening artifacts were severe enough to cause us to abandon this option. Current pediatric protocols at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center rely on 100- and 120-kVp settings. The display field-of-view parameter can be used as a surrogate for patient size to develop clinical pediatric CT protocol charts.

CONCLUSION. CT dose index measurements obtained using the 16-cm standard acrylic phantom are sufficiently accurate for estimating chest and abdominopelvic CT entrance exposures for pediatric patients of the same approximate size as the anthropomorphic phantoms used in this study. Image-noise measurements can be used to adjust chest and abdominopelvic CT techniques for pediatric populations, resulting in a decrease in measured entrance dose by 60–90%.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S V VOLLMAR and W A KALENDER
Reduction of dose to the female breast as a result of spectral optimisation for high-contrast thoracic CT imaging: a phantom study
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2009; 82(983): 920 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Herzog, D. M. Mulvihill, S. A. Nguyen, G. Savino, B. Schmidt, P. Costello, T. J. Vogl, and U. J. Schoepf
Pediatric Cardiovascular CT Angiography: Radiation Dose Reduction Using Automatic Anatomic Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1232 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Tubiana, S. Nagataki, L. E. Feinendegen, D. A. Dimitroyannis, D. P. Frush, M. J. Goske, M. Hernanz-Schulman, P. Soyer, H. Varnholt, D. J. Brenner, et al.
Computed Tomography and Radiation Exposure
N. Engl. J. Med., February 21, 2008; 358(8): 850 - 853.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. D. MacKenzie, J. Nazario-Larrieu, T. Cai, M. S. Ledbetter, M. A. Duran-Mendicuti, P. F. Judy, and F. J. Rybicki
Reduced-Dose CT: Effect on Reader Evaluation in Detection of Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1371 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
W Mazrani, K McHugh, and P J Marsden
The radiation burden of radiological investigations
Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 1127 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. M. Heyer, P. S. Mohr, S. P. Lemburg, S. A. Peters, and V. Nicolas
Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 577 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
F. R. Long
High-Resolution Computed Tomography of the Lung in Children with Cystic Fibrosis: Technical Factors
Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 306 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Fujii, T Aoyama, S Koyama, and C Kawaura
Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
Z A Aziz, J C Davies, E W Alton, A U Wells, D M Geddes, and D M Hansell
Computed tomography and cystic fibrosis: promises and problems
Thorax, February 1, 2007; 62(2): 181 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. H. McCollough, M. R. Bruesewitz, and J. M. Kofler Jr
CT Dose Reduction and Dose Management Tools: Overview of Available Options.
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 503 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. H. Mulkens, P. Bellinck, M. Baeyaert, D. Ghysen, X. Van Dijck, E. Mussen, C. Venstermans, and J.-L. Termote
Use of an Automatic Exposure Control Mechanism for Dose Optimization in Multi-Detector Row CT Examinations: Clinical Evaluation
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 213 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. C. O'Daniel, D. M. Stevens, and D. D. Cody
Reducing Radiation Exposure from Survey CT Scans
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 509 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Boone
What Parameters Are Most Accurate in Predicting Appropriate Technique Factors for CT Scanning?
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 377 - 378.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Siegel, B. Schmidt, D. Bradley, C. Suess, and C. Hildebolt
Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric CT: Effect of Technical Factors and Phantom Size and Shape
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 515 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-F. Paul, H. T. Abada, A. Sigal-Cinqualbre, E. Lee, and M. Siegel
Should Low-Kilovoltage Chest CT Protocols Be the Rule for Pediatric Patients?
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1172 - 1172.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.