AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ratnapalan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Koren, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ratnapalan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Koren, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:1107-1109
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Physicians' Perceptions of Teratogenic Risk Associated with Radiography and CT During Early Pregnancy

Savithiri Ratnapalan1,2, Nicole Bona2, Kiran Chandra2 and Gideon Koren2

1 Division of Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
2 Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Motherisk Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine family physicians' and obstetricians' perceptions of the risk of major fetal malformations associated with exposure to radiation from radiography and CT during early pregnancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Structured questionnaires were sent to 400 family physicians and 100 obstetricians selected randomly across Ontario, Canada. The physicians were informed about the 1–3% baseline risk for major malformations and were asked about their perceptions of the risk to the fetus associated with an abdominal radiograph and an abdominal CT scan during early pregnancy and whether they would recommend a therapeutic abortion after such exposure.

RESULTS. Fifty-five percent (218/400) of the family physicians and 69% (69/100) of the obstetricians responded to our questionnaire. Forty-four percent of family physicians estimated the risk associated with an abdominal radiograph to be 5% or greater, and 61% estimated the risk associated with an abdominal CT scan to be 5% or greater. Eleven percent of obstetricians estimated the risk associated with radiographs to be 5% or greater (p < 0.001), and 34% estimated the risk associated with CT scans to be 5% or greater (p < 0.001). Among family physicians, 1% recommended an abortion if the fetus was exposed to radiation from radiography and 6% after exposure to radiation from CT. None of the obstetricians recommended an abortion after exposure to radiation from an abdominal radiograph, but 5% recommended an abortion after exposure to radiation from an abdominal CT scan in early pregnancy.

CONCLUSION. Our survey shows that physicians who care for pregnant women perceive the teratogenic risk associated with an abdominal radiograph and an abdominal CT scan to be unrealistically high during early pregnancy. This misperception could lead to increased anxiety among pregnant women seeking counseling and to unnecessary terminations of otherwise wanted pregnancies. This perception of high teratogenic risk associated with radiation could also lead to a delay in needed care of pregnant women.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. M. Chen, F. V. Coakley, A. Kaimal, and R. K. Laros Jr
Guidelines for Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use During Pregnancy and Lactation
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2008; 112(2): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. A. Jaffe, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. I. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, L. M. Hurwitz, and R. C. Nelson
Early First-Trimester Fetal Radiation Dose Estimation in 16-MDCT Without and With Automated Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 860 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. J. Patel, D. L. Reede, D. S. Katz, R. Subramaniam, and J. K. Amorosa
Imaging the Pregnant Patient for Nonobstetric Conditions: Algorithms and Radiation Dose Considerations
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1705 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. Togashi
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 917 - 918.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. K. Yousefzadeh, M. B. Ward, and C. Reft
Internal Barium Shielding to Minimize Fetal Irradiation in Spiral Chest CT: A Phantom Simulation Experiment.
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 751 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. L. Hadley, J. Agola, and P. Wong
Potential Impact of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria on CT for Trauma.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 937 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. M. Hurwitz, T. Yoshizumi, R. E. Reiman, P. C. Goodman, E. K. Paulson, D. P. Frush, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and L. Barnes
Radiation Dose to the Fetus from Body MDCT During Early Gestation.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 871 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.