| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Division of Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University
Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
2 Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Motherisk Program, The
Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine family physicians' and obstetricians' perceptions of the risk of major fetal malformations associated with exposure to radiation from radiography and CT during early pregnancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Structured questionnaires were sent to 400 family physicians and 100 obstetricians selected randomly across Ontario, Canada. The physicians were informed about the 1–3% baseline risk for major malformations and were asked about their perceptions of the risk to the fetus associated with an abdominal radiograph and an abdominal CT scan during early pregnancy and whether they would recommend a therapeutic abortion after such exposure.
RESULTS. Fifty-five percent (218/400) of the family physicians and 69% (69/100) of the obstetricians responded to our questionnaire. Forty-four percent of family physicians estimated the risk associated with an abdominal radiograph to be 5% or greater, and 61% estimated the risk associated with an abdominal CT scan to be 5% or greater. Eleven percent of obstetricians estimated the risk associated with radiographs to be 5% or greater (p < 0.001), and 34% estimated the risk associated with CT scans to be 5% or greater (p < 0.001). Among family physicians, 1% recommended an abortion if the fetus was exposed to radiation from radiography and 6% after exposure to radiation from CT. None of the obstetricians recommended an abortion after exposure to radiation from an abdominal radiograph, but 5% recommended an abortion after exposure to radiation from an abdominal CT scan in early pregnancy.
CONCLUSION. Our survey shows that physicians who care for pregnant women perceive the teratogenic risk associated with an abdominal radiograph and an abdominal CT scan to be unrealistically high during early pregnancy. This misperception could lead to increased anxiety among pregnant women seeking counseling and to unnecessary terminations of otherwise wanted pregnancies. This perception of high teratogenic risk associated with radiation could also lead to a delay in needed care of pregnant women.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. A. Jaffe, A. M. Neville, C. Anderson-Evans, S. Long, C. Lowry, T. T. Yoshizumi, and G. Toncheva Early First Trimester Fetal Dose Estimation Method in a Multivendor Study of 16- and 64-MDCT Scanners and Low-Dose Imaging Protocols Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): 1019 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. F. Malone Radiation protection in medicine: ethical framework revisited Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2009; 135(2): 71 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. K. Pahade, D. Litmanovich, I. Pedrosa, J. Romero, A. A. Bankier, and P. M. Boiselle Quality Initiatives@;DELIM@;Continuing Medical Education: Imaging Pregnant Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: What the Radiologist Needs to Know1 RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 639 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. K. Pahade, D. Litmanovich, I. Pedrosa, J. Romero, A. A. Bankier, and P. M. Boiselle Quality Initiatives: Imaging Pregnant Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: What the Radiologist Needs to Know RadioGraphics, March 30, 2009; (2009) 293085226. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ratnapalan MD, Y. Bentur MD, and G. Koren MD "Doctor, will that x-ray harm my unborn child?" Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 2, 2008; 179(12): 1293 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Jaffe, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. I. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, L. M. Hurwitz, and R. C. Nelson Early First-Trimester Fetal Radiation Dose Estimation in 16-MDCT Without and With Automated Tube Current Modulation Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 860 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Patel, D. L. Reede, D. S. Katz, R. Subramaniam, and J. K. Amorosa Imaging the Pregnant Patient for Nonobstetric Conditions: Algorithms and Radiation Dose Considerations RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1705 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Togashi Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 917 - 918. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. K. Yousefzadeh, M. B. Ward, and C. Reft Internal Barium Shielding to Minimize Fetal Irradiation in Spiral Chest CT: A Phantom Simulation Experiment. Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Hadley, J. Agola, and P. Wong Potential Impact of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria on CT for Trauma. Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 937 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Hurwitz, T. Yoshizumi, R. E. Reiman, P. C. Goodman, E. K. Paulson, D. P. Frush, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and L. Barnes Radiation Dose to the Fetus from Body MDCT During Early Gestation. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 871 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
