AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Szejnfeld, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Szejnfeld, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:1251-1254
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Diagnostic Value of Attenuation Measurements of the Kidney on Unenhanced Helical CT of Obstructive Ureterolithiasis

Suzan M. Goldman1, Salomão Faintuch1,2, Sergio A. Ajzen1,3, Dejaldo M. J. Christofalo1,3, Marcelo P. Araújo1, Valdemar Ortiz4, Miguel Srougi4, Philip J. Kenney5 and Jacob Szejnfeld1

1 Department of Radiology, Federal University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Napoleão de Barros 800, São Paulo CEP 04024-002, Brazil.
2 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
3 Department of Radiology, Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão UNIFESP, Rua Borges Lagoa 960, São Paulo CEP 04038-002, Brazil.
4 Department of Urology, Federal University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Napoleão de Barros 715/2, São Paulo CEP 04024-002, Brazil.
5 Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 S 19th St., Birmingham, AL 35233.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of attenuation measurements of the kidney on unenhanced helical CT in patients with obstructive ureterolithiasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Consecutive unenhanced helical CT scans of patients referred for acute unilateral renal colic were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with CT evidence of other urinary system diseases were excluded. Included scans (n = 145) were assessed for ureteral stone and secondary signs of obstruction such as unilateral collecting system or ureteral dilatation, perinephric stranding, and periureteral edema. Renal attenuation in Hounsfield units was measured in the upper, middle, and lower portions of the parenchyma, and a mean value was determined for each kidney.

RESULTS. Ureteral stones were present in 76 patients. Renal attenuation on the side with lithiasis was lower than on the opposite kidney: 27.2 ± 3.9 H vs 32.6 ± 3.4 H (p < 0.001). Attenuation differences between kidneys were higher for patients with ureterolithiasis: 5.4 ± 3.2 H (range, –3.3 to 13.0 H) versus 1.2 ± 1.0 H (range, 0–4.7 H) (p < 0.001). An attenuation difference between kidneys greater than or equal to 5.0 H had 61% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, 69% negative predictive value, and 79% accuracy for diagnosis of ureteral lithiasis.

CONCLUSION. Attenuation difference between kidneys greater than or equal to 5.0 H was a valuable sign and had diagnostic performance similar to other secondary signs of obstructive ureterolithiasis. Furthermore, attenuation difference had the advantage of being an objective, measurement-based indicator.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.