AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haims, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Forman, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haims, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Forman, H. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:1267-1270
© American Roentgen Ray Society


MRI in the Diagnosis of Cartilage Injury in the Wrist

Andrew H. Haims1, Andrew E. Moore2,3, Mark E. Schweitzer4, William B. Morrison4, Diane Deely4, Randall W. Culp5 and Howard P. Forman1

1 Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., PO Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520-8042.
2 Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, 800 Howard Ave., PO Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071.
3 Present address: United States Air Force, Yokota Air Base, Japan.
4 Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107.
5 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in identifying articular cartilage abnormalities in the distal radius, scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum of patients with wrist pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty-six MRI examinations of the wrist in 85 patients (41 indirect MR arthrograms and 45 unenhanced [nonarthrographic] MR images) were evaluated. The study population consisted of 47 male (54.7%) and 38 female (45.3%) patients with an average age of 37.5 years (range, 7–62 years). Three experienced musculoskeletal radiologists who were unaware of surgical findings retrospectively evaluated the MRI examinations for cartilage abnormalities in the distal radius, scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum. All patients underwent arthroscopy of the radiocarpal joint with inspection of the articular surfaces of the distal radius, scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum. The articular cartilage was evaluated on the basis of the 5-point scale of the Outerbridge classification system.

RESULTS. When at least two of the three radiologists had concordant interpretations, sensitivity for abnormalities in the distal radius was 27%; the scaphoid, 31%; the lunate, 41%; and the triquetrum, 18%. Specificity for the distal radius was 91%; the scaphoid, 90%; the lunate, 75%; and the triquetrum, 93%. Weighted kappa values among the three observers showed only fair agreement (0.279–0.360). High-grade more extensive cartilage lesions were no more accurately identified than low-grade lesions. Indirect MR arthrograms were not statistically more sensitive, specific, or accurate than unenhanced studies. No bone was more frequently or less frequently graded correctly or incorrectly with statistical significance. The variables of sex, age, and the presence of multiple bones with lesions did not affect accuracy.

CONCLUSION. Our findings suggest that MRI of the wrist with the techniques described is not adequately sensitive or accurate for diagnosing cartilage defects in the distal radius, scaphoid, lunate, or triquetrum.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
J MUTIMER, J GREEN, and J FIELD
Comparison of MRI and Wrist Arthroscopy for Assessment of Wrist Cartilage
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., June 1, 2008; 33(3): 380 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Moser, J.-C. Dosch, A. Moussaoui, and J.-L. Dietemann
Wrist Ligament Tears: Evaluation of MRI and Combined MDCT and MR Arthrography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1278 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Saupe, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, T. Schertler, M. Manestar, and D. Weishaupt
MR Imaging of Cartilage in Cadaveric Wrists: Comparison between Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and Gross Pathologic Inspection
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 180 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K.-P. Jungius, M. R. Schmid, M. Zanetti, J. Hodler, P. Koch, and C. W. A. Pfirrmann
Cartilaginous Defects of the Femorotibial Joint: Accuracy of Coronal Short Inversion Time Inversion-Recovery MR Sequence
Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 482 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.