AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:1313-1317
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel

Shigeru Suzuki1, Shigeru Furui, Tatsuro Kaminaga and Teiyu Yamauchi

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. This investigation was performed to evaluate the accuracy of diameter measurement of vessels in vitro by automated software for CT angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Vascular models with three inner diameters ({approx} 3, 4, and 6 mm) filled with contrast medium of three different densities ({approx} 460, 350, and 210 H) were scanned with helical CT. Five convolution kernels (soft, standard, detail, bone, and lung) were used. We evaluated the measurement error, defined as the difference between the diameter measured by the automated software and the true inner diameter of the vascular model. Statistical analysis involved three-way analysis of variance with repeated measures.

RESULTS. Significant differences occurred in measurement error among the three vascular model inner diameters, among the three densities of intravascular contrast medium, and among the five convolution kernels (p < 0.01). In all the convolution kernels except lung, measurement errors progressively decreased with higher densities of intravascular contrast medium (p < 0.01). In vascular models filled with contrast medium of 350 H, measurement errors were significantly smaller in soft (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 0.29 ± 0.16 mm) and bone (0.23 ± 0.05 mm) than in other convolution kernels (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION. The accuracy of diameter measurement was affected by the vascular model inner diameter, the density of contrast medium, and the convolution kernel. A higher density of intravascular contrast medium and selection of the proper convolution kernel will improve accuracy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Rengier, T. F. Weber, F. L. Giesel, D. Bockler, H.-U. Kauczor, and H. von Tengg-Kobligk
Centerline Analysis of Aortic CT Angiographic Examinations: Benefits and Limitations
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): W255 - W263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Fei, X. Du, Q. Yang, Y. Shen, P. Li, J. Liao, and K. Li
64-MDCT Coronary Angiography: Phantom Study of Effects of Vascular Attenuation on Detection of Coronary Stenosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. P. Villablanca, F. J. Rodriguez, T. Stockman, S. Dahliwal, M. Omura, S. Hazany, and J. Sayre
MDCT Angiography for Detection and Quantification of Small Intracranial Arteries: Comparison with Conventional Catheter Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 593 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. T. Lau, L. J. Ridley, P. G. Bannon, L. A. Wong, J. Trieu, D. B. Brieger, H. C. Lowe, B. S. Freedman, and L. Kritharides
Lumen Loss in the First Year in Saphenous Vein Grafts Is Predominantly a Result of Negative Remodeling of the Whole Vessel Rather Than a Result of Changes in Wall Thickness
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-435 - I-440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
F. Hyafil, J.-P. Laissy, M. Mazighi, D. Tchetche, L. Louedec, H. Adle-Biassette, S. Chillon, D. Henin, M.-P. Jacob, D. Letourneur, et al.
Ferumoxtran-10-Enhanced MRI of the Hypercholesterolemic Rabbit Aorta: Relationship Between Signal Loss and Macrophage Infiltration
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 176 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga
Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Berg, Z. Zhang, A. Ikonen, P. Sipola, R. Kalviainen, H. Manninen, and R. Vanninen
Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in the Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic Patients: Comparison with Rotational Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1022 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.