| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
OBJECTIVE. This investigation was performed to evaluate the accuracy of diameter measurement of vessels in vitro by automated software for CT angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Vascular models with three inner diameters
(
3, 4, and 6 mm) filled with contrast medium of three different densities
( 460, 350, and 210 H) were scanned with helical CT. Five convolution
kernels (soft, standard, detail, bone, and lung) were used. We evaluated the
measurement error, defined as the difference between the diameter measured by
the automated software and the true inner diameter of the vascular model.
Statistical analysis involved three-way analysis of variance with repeated
measures.
RESULTS. Significant differences occurred in measurement error among the three vascular model inner diameters, among the three densities of intravascular contrast medium, and among the five convolution kernels (p < 0.01). In all the convolution kernels except lung, measurement errors progressively decreased with higher densities of intravascular contrast medium (p < 0.01). In vascular models filled with contrast medium of 350 H, measurement errors were significantly smaller in soft (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 0.29 ± 0.16 mm) and bone (0.23 ± 0.05 mm) than in other convolution kernels (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION. The accuracy of diameter measurement was affected by the vascular model inner diameter, the density of contrast medium, and the convolution kernel. A higher density of intravascular contrast medium and selection of the proper convolution kernel will improve accuracy.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  X. Fei, X. Du, Q. Yang, Y. Shen, P. Li, J. Liao, and K. Li 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography: Phantom Study of Effects of Vascular Attenuation on Detection of Coronary Stenosis Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Villablanca, F. J. Rodriguez, T. Stockman, S. Dahliwal, M. Omura, S. Hazany, and J. Sayre MDCT Angiography for Detection and Quantification of Small Intracranial Arteries: Comparison with Conventional Catheter Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 593 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. T. Lau, L. J. Ridley, P. G. Bannon, L. A. Wong, J. Trieu, D. B. Brieger, H. C. Lowe, B. S. Freedman, and L. Kritharides Lumen Loss in the First Year in Saphenous Vein Grafts Is Predominantly a Result of Negative Remodeling of the Whole Vessel Rather Than a Result of Changes in Wall Thickness Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-435 - I-440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Hyafil, J.-P. Laissy, M. Mazighi, D. Tchetche, L. Louedec, H. Adle-Biassette, S. Chillon, D. Henin, M.-P. Jacob, D. Letourneur, et al. Ferumoxtran-10-Enhanced MRI of the Hypercholesterolemic Rabbit Aorta: Relationship Between Signal Loss and Macrophage Infiltration Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 176 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Berg, Z. Zhang, A. Ikonen, P. Sipola, R. Kalviainen, H. Manninen, and R. Vanninen Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in the Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease in Symptomatic Patients: Comparison with Rotational Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1022 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
