AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunz, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kreitner, K.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kunz, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kreitner, K.-F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:1319-1326
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Assessment of Chronic Aortic Dissection: Contribution of Different ECG-Gated Breath-Hold MRI Techniques

R. Peter Kunz1, Katja Oberholzer1, Wlodzimierz Kuroczynski2, Georg Horstick3, Frank Krummenauer4, Manfred Thelen1 and Karl-Friedrich Kreitner1

1 Department of Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Mainz 55131, Germany.
2 Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz 55131, Germany.
3 Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz 55131, Germany.
4 Department of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg-University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of different rapid MRI techniques for the assessment and follow-up of chronic aortic dissections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-three patients (41 postoperative Stanford type A, 12 type B dissections) were scanned at 1.5 T during a 3-year period. The study reviewed ECG-gated breath-hold black blood sequences and 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta supplemented by segmented cine and phase-contrast imaging as well as abdominal contrast-enhanced MR angiography. A retrospective separate analysis of black blood acquisitions and contrast-enhanced MR angiograms from a total of 72 examinations was performed by two radiologists to evaluate detection of intimal flaps and assess image quality.

RESULTS. Sensitivity and specificity of black blood sequences compared with those of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in detecting intimal flaps were 87% and 94% for the thoracic aorta, and 54% and 97% for the supraaortic branches, respectively. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was subjectively rated as superior to black blood techniques for visualizing intimal flaps and yielded better overall image quality (p < 0.001). Aortic valve competence can be assessed on segmented cine techniques. Phase-contrast sequences enabled the quantification of regurgitant flow across the aortic valve and the analysis of flow patterns in the true and false channels.

CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is superior to black blood MRI in detecting the presence or absence of intimal flaps and is particularly useful in assessing supraaortic branch vessel involvement. Cine and phase-contrast techniques should be included in the imaging follow-up to diagnose possible complications of chronic aortic dissections.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. B. Srichai, R. P. Lim, S. Wong, and V. S. Lee
Cardiovascular Applications of Phase-Contrast MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 662 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.