AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abcarian, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yoon, H.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abcarian, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yoon, H.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 182:1377-1381
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Role of a Quantitative D-Dimer Assay in Determining the Need for CT Angiography of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Peter W. Abcarian1, Jason D. Sweet, John T. Watabe and Hyo-Chun Yoon

1 All authors: Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, 3288 Moanalua Rd., Honolulu, HI 96814.

OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to use the results of a quantitative D-dimer assay to determine the need for pulmonary CT angiography in patients suspected of having acute pulmonary embolism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. From July 2001 to December 2002, 755 patients underwent pulmonary CT angiography for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. A rapid, fully automated quantitative D-dimer assay was obtained in more than half the patients. The electronic medical records of the patients were subsequently reviewed to analyze the negative predictive value of the D-dimer assay in the diagnostic workup of acute pulmonary embolism and to determine the outcome of the patients who had negative findings on both D-dimer assay and pulmonary CT angiography at 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS. Of the 755 patients who underwent pulmonary CT angiography, 666 (88.2%) had negative findings, 73 (9.7%) had positive findings, and 16 (2.1%) were indeterminate. A total of 426 patients underwent both pulmonary CT angiography and D-dimer level evaluation, and 84 of these had negative findings (< 0.4 µg/mL) on D-dimer assay. Eighty-two of the 84 patients with negative findings on D-dimer assay had negative findings on pulmonary CT angiography; two were indeterminate and both subsequently had low-probability ventilation–perfusion studies. Among patients with positive D-dimer assays, no one with a level between 0.4 and 1.0 µg/mL had pulmonary CT angiography with findings positive for pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION. A quantitative D-dimer assay was effective in excluding the need for pulmonary CT angiography and had high negative predictive value when the D-dimer level was less than 1.0 µg/mL.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. T. Gupta, R. K. Kakarla, K. J. Kirshenbaum, and V. F. Tapson
D-Dimers and Efficacy of Clinical Risk Estimation Algorithms: Sensitivity in Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 425 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. King, A. A. Vaze, C. S. Moskowitz, L. J. Smith, and M. S. Ginsberg
D-Dimer Assay to Exclude Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Oncologic Population: Correlation with CT Pulmonary Angiography in an Urgent Care Setting
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 854 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. D. Raptopoulos, P. B. Boiselle, N. Michailidis, J. Handwerker, A. Sabir, J. A. Edlow, I. Pedrosa, and J. B. Kruskal
MDCT Angiography of Acute Chest Pain: Evaluation of ECG-Gated and Nongated Techniques
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S346 - S356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman
IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.