HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jung, N.-Y. Articles by Byun, J.-Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jung, N.-Y. Articles by Byun, J.-Y. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Discrimination of Tuberculous Spondylitis from Pyogenic Spondylitis on MRI

¹ Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpodong, Seocho-ku, Seoul 137-040, Korea.
² Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
³ Department of Neurosurgery, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea. Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of MRI for discrimination between tuberculous spondylitis and pyogenic spondylitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images of 52 patients who had MRI of the spine and confirmed spondylitis were retrospectively reviewed. After review of medical records, we compared MRI findings in 20 patients with tuberculous spondylitis and 20 patients with pyogenic spondylitis. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi-square test.

RESULTS. The reviewer identified tuberculous spondylitis with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100% (20/20), 80% (16/20), and 90% (36/40), and pyogenic spondylitis with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 80% (16/20), 100% (20/20), and 90% (36/40), respectively. The patients with tuberculous spondylitis had a significantly higher incidence of MRI findings as follows (p < 0.05): a well-defined paraspinal abnormal signal (95% [19/20] in tuberculous vs 25% [5/20] in pyogenic), a thin and smooth abscess wall (95% [19/20] vs 15% [3/20]), combination of both findings (90% [18/20] vs 0% [0/20]), presence of paraspinal or intraosseous abscess (95% [19/20] vs 50% [10/20]), subligamentous spread to three or more vertebral levels (85% [17/20] vs 40% [8/20]), involvement of multiple vertebral bodies (60% [12/20] vs 25% [5/20]), thoracic spine involvement (40% [8/20] vs 10% [2/20]), and hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images (95% [19/20] vs 65% [13/20]).

CONCLUSION. MRI was accurate for differentiation of tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. SIEMIONOW, M. STEINMETZ, G. BELL, H. ILASLAN, and R. F. MCLAIN Identifying serious causes of back pain: cancer, infection, fracture. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, August 1, 2008; 75(8): 557 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pourbagher, M. A. Pourbagher, L. Savas, T. Turunc, Y. Z. Demiroglu, I. Erol, and D. Yalcintas Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Imaging Findings in Brucellosis Patients with Osteoarticular Involvement Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 873 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]