|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St., HX
318, Lexington, KY 40536.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
40536.
3 Joyner Sports Medicine Institute, 601 Perimeter Dr., Ste. 110, Lexington, KY
40517.
4 Present address: Department of Biomechanics, McKinly Lab, Newark, DE
19701.
5 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Kentucky,
Lexington, KY 40536.
6 Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
40536.
OBJECTIVE. The goal of this prospective randomized study was to determine whether isosmolar contrast material offers an advantage over low-osmolar contrast material for delayed venous opacification in CT venography.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively enrolled 200 adult outpatients. Patients were randomized to receive either the low-osmolar (hyperosmolar to blood) nonionic contrast medium, iohexol, or the nonionic isosmolar contrast medium, iodixanol. Images were obtained before contrast administration and 180 sec after contrast administration through the pelvis at the level of the external iliac vessels. Opacification of the external iliac vessels was assessed both objectively and subjectively.
RESULTS. The arterial and venous densities before contrast
administration were approximately 45 H for both groups. On delayed images
obtained after contrast administration, the mean venous density was 95.2 H for
iohexol and 101.4 H for iodixanol. Changes in venous density due to
administration of iohexol and iodixanol were 49.8 and 56.1 H, respectively.
This 12.5% difference was highly significant (p = 0.002). Sixty-six
percent of the images in the iodixanol group were rated either 4 (good) or 5
(excellent), whereas only 36% of the iohexol group achieved a similar rating
on our subjective rating scale. This difference was statistically significant
(
2 = 16.4, p < 0.001, df = 1).
CONCLUSION. Our study shows that isosmolar contrast material provides significant improvement in delayed opacification of the external iliac vessels in comparison with conventional low-osmolar contrast medium (hyperosmolar to blood).
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Arakawa, T. Kohno, T. Hiki, and Y. Kaji CT Pulmonary Angiography and CT Venography: Factors Associated with Vessel Enhancement Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 156 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ghaye, A. Nchimi, C. T. Noukoua, and R. F. Dondelinger Does Multi-Detector Row CT Pulmonary Angiography Reduce the Incremental Value of Indirect CT Venography Compared with Single-Detector Row CT Pulmonary Angiography? Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 256 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |