HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Floemer, F. Articles by Ledermann, H. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Floemer, F. Articles by Ledermann, H. P. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

MRI Characteristics of Olecranon Bursitis

¹ Universitätsinstitut für Radiologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel 4031, Switzerland.
² Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107.

OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to describe the MRI characteristics of septic and nonseptic olecranon bursitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. MRI contrast-enhanced examinations (n = 19) of 35 patients with olecranon bursitis (septic, n = 14; nonseptic, n = 21) were jointly reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. We evaluated bursa size, extent of marginal lobulation, septation, concomitant elbow joint effusion, soft-tissue edema, rim enhancement, soft-tissue enhancement, degree of fluid complexity, definition of bursa margins, presence of edema, thickening of the triceps tendon, and bone marrow edema.

RESULTS. Comparison of septic and nonseptic bursitis yielded the following results: marginal lobulation, 79% (11/14) versus 48% (10/21), p = 0.14; bursa septation, 64% (9/14) versus 57% (12/21), p = 1.0; moderate or marked complexity of bursa fluid, 64% (9/14) versus 29% (6/21), p = 0.15; poorly defined margins, 64% (9/14) versus 67% (14/21), p = 1.0; elbow joint effusion, 86% (12/14) versus 52% (11/21), p = 0.12; moderate to marked soft-tissue edema, 64% (9/14) versus 33% (7/21), p = 0.1; edema of the triceps, 57% (8/14) versus 48% (10/21), p = 0.73; thickening of the triceps, 43% (6/14) versus 14% (3/21), p = 0.21; bone marrow edema, 29% (4/14) versus 5% (1/21), p = 0.13; rim enhancement, 100% (11/11) versus 75% (6/8), p = 0.31; soft-tissue enhancement, 100% (11/11) versus 63% (5/8), p = 0.1.

CONCLUSION. Septic and nonseptic olecranon bursitis present with a considerable overlap of MRI findings without statistically significant differences. Septic olecranon bursitis can be excluded in the absence of bursal and soft-tissue enhancement.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. F. Papp, A. J. Khanna, E. F. McCarthy, J. A. Carrino, A. J. Farber, and F. J. Frassica Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Soft-Tissue Tumors: Determinate and Indeterminate Lesions J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(suppl_3): 103 - 115. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Jin, J. H. Lee, D. M. Yang, H. C. Kim, C. W. Ryu, H. P. Shin, J. S. Park, and K. N. Ryu Olecranon Bursitis Communicating With an Olecranon Cyst in Rheumatoid Arthritis J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 857 - 861. [Full Text] [PDF]