|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Dr., Grant Bldg.
S0-68B, Stanford, CA 94305-5105.
2 GE Applied Science Laboratory West, Menlo Park, CA.
3 Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON,
Canada.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to measure relaxation times in musculoskeletal tissues at 1.5 and 3.0 T to optimize musculoskeletal MRI methods at 3.0 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. In the knees of five healthy volunteers, we measured the T1 and T2 relaxation times of cartilage, synovial fluid, muscle, marrow, and fat at 1.5 and 3.0 T. The T1 relaxation times were measured using a spiral Look-Locker sequence with eight samples along the T1 recovery curve. The T2 relaxation times were measured using a spiral T2 preparation sequence with six echoes. Accuracy and repeatability of the T1 and T2 measurement sequences were verified in phantoms.
RESULTS. T1 relaxation times in cartilage, muscle, synovial fluid, marrow, and subcutaneous fat at 3.0 T were consistently higher than those measured at 1.5 T. Measured T2 relaxation times were reduced at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T. Relaxation time measurements in vivo were verified using calculated and measured signal-to-noise results. Relaxation times were used to develop a high-resolution protocol for T2-weighted imaging of the knee at 3.0 T.
CONCLUSION. MRI at 3.0 T can improve resolution and speed in musculoskeletal imaging; however, interactions between field strength and relaxation times need to be considered for optimal image contrast and signal-to-noise ratio. Scanning can be performed in shorter times at 3.0 T using single-average acquisitions. Efficient higher-resolution imaging at 3.0 T can be done by increasing the TR to account for increased T1 relaxation times and acquiring thinner slices than at 1.5 T.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhao, R. Krug, D. Xu, Y. Lu, and T. M. Link MRI of the Spine: Image Quality and Normal-Neoplastic Bone Marrow Contrast at 3 T Versus 1.5 T Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 873 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Jung, Y. C. Yoon, S.-H. Choi, J. W. Kwon, J. Yoo, and B.-K. Choe Three-dimensional Isotropic Shoulder MR Arthrography: Comparison with Two-dimensional MR Arthrography for the Diagnosis of Labral Lesions at 3.0 T Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 498 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Edelman and I. Koktzoglou Unenhanced Flow-Independent MR Venography by Using Signal Targeting Alternative Radiofrequency and Flow-Independent Relaxation Enhancement Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 236 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Stevens, R. F. Busse, E. Han, A. C. S. Brau, P. J. Beatty, C. F. Beaulieu, and G. E. Gold Ankle: Isotropic MR Imaging with 3D-FSE-Cube--Initial Experience in Healthy Volunteers Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 1026 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 16 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, and H. H. Schild Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part I. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 675 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Siepmann, J. McGovern, J. H. Brittain, and S. B. Reeder High-Resolution 3D Cartilage Imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1510 - 1515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Bauer, S. Banerjee, T. D. Henning, R. Krug, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link Fast High-Spatial-Resolution MRI of the Ankle with Parallel Imaging Using GRAPPA at 3 T Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 240 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Gold, R. F. Busse, C. Beehler, E. Han, A. C. S. Brau, P. J. Beatty, and C. F. Beaulieu Isotropic MRI of the Knee with 3D Fast Spin-Echo Extended Echo-Train Acquisition (XETA): Initial Experience Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1287 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Magee and D. Williams Sensitivity and specificity in detection of labral tears with 3.0-T MRI of the shoulder. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1448 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Bauer, S. J. Krause, C. J. Ross, R. Krug, J. Carballido-Gamio, E. Ozhinsky, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link Volumetric Cartilage Measurements of Porcine Knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR Imaging: Evaluation of Precision and Accuracy. Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 399 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Magee and D. Williams 3.0-T MRI of the Supraspinatus Tendon Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 881 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wessling, R. Fischbach, A. Borchert, H. Kugel, T. Allkemper, N. Osada, and W. Heindel Detection of Colorectal Polyps: Comparison of Multi-Detector Row CT and MR Colonography in a Colon Phantom Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Magee and D. Williams 3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 371 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lozano, X. Li, T. M. Link, M. Safran, S. Majumdar, and C. B. Ma Detection of Posttraumatic Cartilage Injury Using Quantitative T1rho Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A Report of Two Cases with Arthroscopic Findings J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1349 - 1352. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Potter and L. F. Foo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Trauma, Degeneration, and Repair Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 661 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishii, H. Tanaka, K. Nakanishi, N. Sugano, H. Miki, and H. Yoshikawa Fat-Suppressed 3D Spoiled Gradient-Echo MRI and MDCT Arthrography of Articular Cartilage in Patients with Hip Dysplasia Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 379 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Gold, B. Suh, A. Sawyer-Glover, and C. Beaulieu Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: Initial Clinical Experience Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1479 - 1486. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |