AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulinna, C.
Right arrow Articles by Scheidler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kulinna, C.
Right arrow Articles by Scheidler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:421-427
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Staging of Rectal Cancer: Diagnostic Potential of Multiplanar Reconstructions with MDCT

C. Kulinna1,2, R. Eibel1, W. Matzek2, H. Bonel1, D. Aust3, T. Strauss4, M. Reiser1 and J. Scheidler1

1 Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Grosshadern Munich, Munich, Germany.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, AKH Vienna, Vienna A-1090, Austria.
3 Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Grosshadern Munich, Munich, Germany.
4 Department of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians University Grosshadern Munich, Munich, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs) of MDCT could improve local staging of rectal cancer.

CONCLUSION. Adding MPRs, on the basis of the MDCT data sets, provides definite improvements in the accurate local staging of rectal cancer compared with standard axial reconstructions alone.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Yitta, E. M. Hecht, C. M. Slywotzky, and G. L. Bennett
Added Value of Multiplanar Reformation in the Multidetector CT Evaluation of the Female Pelvis: A Pictorial Review
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2009; 29(7): 1987 - 2003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H.-K. Chun, D. Choi, M. J. Kim, J. Lee, S. H. Yun, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, and C. K. Kim
Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1557 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
H Furukawa, H Ikuma, A Seki, K Yokoe, S Yuen, T Aramaki, and S Yamagushi
Positron emission tomography scanning is not superior to whole body multidetector helical computed tomography in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer
Gut, July 1, 2006; 55(7): 1007 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.