| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323
Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8896.
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9032.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences are seen in calculation of fetal weight using 5-mm sagittal, 3-mm coronal, and 8-mm axial MRI acquisitions compared with term birth weight and contemporaneous sonography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fetal volume measurements were obtained from MRI acquisitions as follows: 5-mm sagittal (2 acquisitions), 3-mm coronal (2 acquisitions), and 8-mm axial (1 acquisition). A 90-sec single-shot fast spin-echo sequence was used. MRI and sonographic studies for fetal weight estimates were performed within 3 hr of term delivery. MRI calculation was based on the equation 0.12 + 1.031 x fetal volume (fetal area x slice thickness) (mL) = MRI fetal weight (kg). The sonographic fetal weight estimate was calculated using the Hadlock formula. MRI and sonographic calculations were compared with birth weight. Concordance coefficient analysis was performed.
RESULTS. Thirty-five retrospective fetal calculations were performed. Concordance coefficients, gram weight means and standard deviations (mean ± SD) between birth weight and MRI acquisitions were as follows: 8-mm axial, 0.91 (3,554 ± 431 g); 3-mm coronal, 0.84 (3,752 ± 578 g); and 5-mm sagittal, 0.83 (3,685 ± 567 g), compared with 0.78 (3,518 ± 332 g) for sonography. The MRI axial concordance coefficient was significantly different from that of the sonographic estimates (p = 0.05). MRI axial concordance coefficient was not statistically different from that of the MRI coronal concordance coefficient (p = 0.22) or the MRI sagittal concordance coefficient (p = 0.19).
CONCLUSION. Calculated weights from a 90-sec single-shot fast spin-echo sequence MR acquisition with 8-mm-thick slices in the axial plane at term are better than sonographic estimates.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. R. Hatab, M. V. Zaretsky, J. M. Alexander, and D. M. Twickler Comparison of Fetal Biometric Values with Sonographic and 3D Reconstruction MRI in Term Gestations Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 340 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. M. Cannie, J. C. Jani, F. Van Kerkhove, J. Meerschaert, F. De Keyzer, L. Lewi, J. A. Deprest, and S. Dymarkowski Fetal Body Volume at MR Imaging to Quantify Total Fetal Lung Volume: Normal Ranges Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Gorincour, D. Eurin, F. E. Avni, For the GRRIF Group (Groupe Radiopediatrique de Re, M. Cannie, J. C. Jani, F. De Keyzer, S. Dymarkowski, and J. A. Deprest Prenatal Prediction of Pulmonary Hypoplasia: US and MR Imaging Working Together Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 608 - 609. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. Conway Obstetric Management in Gestational Diabetes Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(Supplement_2): S175 - S179. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Cannie, J. C. Jani, F. D. Keyzer, R. Devlieger, D. V. Schoubroeck, I. Witters, G. Marchal, S. Dymarkowski, and J. A. Deprest Fetal Body Volume: Use at MR Imaging to Quantify Relative Lung Volume in Fetuses Suspected of Having Pulmonary Hypoplasia Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 847 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
