AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Provenzale, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klintworth, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Provenzale, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klintworth, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:505-511
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Trilateral Retinoblastoma: Clinical and Radiologic Progression

James M. Provenzale1, Sridharan Gururangan2 and Gordon Klintworth3

1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
2 Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
3 Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiologic features of tumor progression in children with trilateral retinoblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Clinical records of eight children with trilateral retinoblastoma were reviewed for the patient's age at the time of diagnosis of the ocular tumor, time interval from diagnosis of ocular retinoblastoma to discovery of the intracranial tumor, time interval from diagnosis of retinoblastoma to death, and time interval from diagnosis of the intracranial tumor to death. CT or MRI studies were reviewed for the appearance of the primary intracranial neoplasm, intracranial metastases, and spinal metastases.

RESULTS. The mean age of the patients at diagnosis of bilateral retinoblastoma was 4.5 months, and the mean age at diagnosis of the intracranial midline tumor was 26 months. The mean interval from the time of diagnosis of retinoblastoma to discovery of the intracranial tumor was 21.5 months. Two children had spinal leptomeningeal metastases at the time of discovery of the midline intracranial mass although no intracranial metastases were seen on imaging. In the other children, intracranial and spinal leptomeningeal metastases frequently developed within months of the diagnosis of retinoblastoma despite lack of progression in the midline intracranial lesion. Six children died of leptomeningeal spread of tumor. The mean interval from diagnosis of the ocular tumor to death was 46 months and from diagnosis of the intracranial tumor to death was 17 months. One child developed metastatic retinoblastoma in the ulna 10 years after the diagnosis of the intracranial tumor.

CONCLUSION. Children typically died of leptomeningeal tumor dissemination despite lack of progression in the midline intracranial mass. Effective treatment of trilateral retinoblastoma may require close evaluation of these children for leptomeningeal dissemination.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Kadom and R. W. Sze
Radiological Reasoning: Leukocoria in a Child
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3_Supplement): S40 - S44.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.