AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Mattrey, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Mattrey, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:513-517
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Model to Quantify Lymph Node Enhancement on Indirect Sonographic Lymphography

Sang-Hee Choi1,2, Yuko Kono1, Jacqueline Corbeil1, Olivier Lucidarme1,3 and Robert F. Mattrey1

1 Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr., San Diego, CA 92103.

OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to develop a reliable technique that has minimal operator dependence for quantifying lymph node enhancement to test and optimize new sonography contrast formulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty healthy rabbits were studied using five agents, labeled A-G. Agents D and E were the same agent and agents F and G were Imagent, studied blindly to test reproducibility. One milliliter of contrast agent was injected into each hind footpad. A 13-MHz transducer was fixed over the popliteal node, which was imaged at a 4.8-MHz central transmit frequency using phase-inversion technology at 100% power and one frame per second. Immediately after each injection, the footpad was massaged 12 times for 30 sec each time and then imaged after each massage to assess the number of times the node could be refilled from each injection. Lymph node video intensity was measured, and the degree of enhancement was evaluated using analysis of variance with the massage number and the agent used as independent variables.

RESULTS. Lymph node enhancement was observed after the first massage with all agents. Degree of enhancement was least with agents A and B, intermediate with agents D and F, and greatest with agent C. Agent A was effective after the first two massages, agent B after the first four, agent C after all 12, agent D after the first eight, and agent F after the first nine. Performance of agents D and F was similar to that of their duplicates, E and G.

CONCLUSION. We established a reproducible technique to quantify lymph node enhancement that can distinguish between different agents. The differences in performance suggest that it is possible to optimize agent formulation for indirect sonographic lymphography.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.