AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riccabona, M.
Right arrow Articles by Riccabona, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riccabona, M.
Right arrow Articles by Riccabona, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:795-800
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Pediatric Imaging

Potential Impact of Pediatric MR Urography on the Imaging Algorithm in Patients with a Functional Single Kidney

Michael Riccabona1, Andrea Ruppert-Kohlmayr1, Ekkehard Ring2, Cornelia Maier1, Lukas Lusuardi3 and Marcus Riccabona3

1 Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, LKH-University Hospital, Auenbruggerplatz, Graz A-8036, Austria.
2 Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria.
3 Department of Pediatric Urology, Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of MR urography in the assessment of children with a suspected "functional single kidney."

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixty patients (age range, 2.7 weeks to 15.7 years) who had been referred for assessment of a suspected functional single kidney underwent MR urography in addition to detailed sonography of the urinary tract and the currently indicated standard imaging. The results of the conventional imaging (99mTc-dimer captosuccinic acid scintigraphy, voiding cystourethrography, and genitography) were compared with the results of sonography and MR urography; surgical findings served as the gold standard if available.

RESULTS. Twenty-six patients had a single kidney. The other diagnoses were six contralateral multicystic dysplastic kidneys, two normal ectopic kidneys, one crossfused double system, and 25 ectopic or dysplastic renal buds. Scintigraphy detected all normal kidneys, two ectopic kidneys, and two dysplastic renal buds. Detailed sonography missed two ectopic kidneys and two orthotopic dysplastic renal buds, but one additional renal bud that could not be confirmed on other imaging techniques (accuracy, 91.7%; sensitivity, 88.2%; specificity, 96.2%) was suspected. MR urography results were correct in all patients and verified in all 13 with surgical correlation.

CONCLUSION. MR urography allows a reliable assessment of renal and ureteral anatomy and of dysplastic or ectopic renal buds, even in non- or poorly functioning systems. MR urography therefore has the potential to replace the currently used excretory urography and scintigraphy. In patients with a suspected functional single kidney a detailed sonographic study and MR urography should be considered the diagnostic algorithm of choice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.