| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Chest Imaging |
1 Department of Radiology, Shanghai Pneumology Hospital, Shanghai, People's
Republic of China.
2 Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Hua-xi Medical Center,
West China University of Medical Sciences, Shichuan, People's Republic of
China.
3 HealthONE Alliance, 5125 Stapleton Dr. N, Denver, CO 80216.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The aim of our study was to evaluate CT scanning protocols to determine how best to minimize patient exposure to ionizing radiation while maintaining sufficient image quality to detect pulmonary diseases.
SUBJECT AND METHODS. The CT dose index (CTDI) was determined by scanning an acrylic phantom at various tube current–time products (7.5–115 mAs). Image quality was evaluated by comparing the homogeneity and noise level of CT scans obtained in the acrylic phantom with those obtained in a water-equivalent phantom. The CT scans obtained at various milliampere-second settings in patients with nodules or diffuse opacifications were assessed. The relationships between the CTDI and the image quality of the CT scans (noise level and artifacts) were established.
RESULTS. The reduction of a conventional tube current–time product (115 mAs) by 65%, 78%, or 93.5% can decrease the CTDI by 60%, 70%, or 85%, respectively. In correlating the image quality of each CT scan to the milliampere-second settings used to obtain it, we found that homogeneity decreased as milliampere-second settings decreased, whereas the noise level increased as milliampere-second settings decreased. For both 8- and 3-mm slice thicknesses, the homogeneity of CT scans acquired at 7.5 mAs or greater was within the acceptable range (< 4 H). However, the noise level of CT scans remained within the acceptable range (< 0.35%) when 25 mAs or greater was used. The evaluation of the image quality of the patients' CT scans indicated no statistical significance in image quality rating between the scans obtained at 25 mAs and those obtained at 115 mAs (p > 0.01).
CONCLUSION. Low-dose (i.e., 40 or 25 mAs) helical chest CT produced satisfactory image quality and reduced the CTDI, thereby maximally protecting patients from radiation exposure.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Kubo, P.-J. P. Lin, W. Stiller, M. Takahashi, H.-U. Kauczor, Y. Ohno, and H. Hatabu Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. MacKenzie, J. Nazario-Larrieu, T. Cai, M. S. Ledbetter, M. A. Duran-Mendicuti, P. F. Judy, and F. J. Rybicki Reduced-Dose CT: Effect on Reader Evaluation in Detection of Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1371 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W Mazrani, K McHugh, and P J Marsden The radiation burden of radiological investigations Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 1127 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Gollub, R. Hong, D. M. Sarasohn, and T. Akhurst Limitations of CT During PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1583 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Madani, V. De Maertelaer, J. Zanen, and P. A. Gevenois Pulmonary Emphysema: Radiation Dose and Section Thickness at Multidetector CT Quantification--Comparison with Macroscopic and Microscopic Morphometry Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 250 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Kuehl, P. Veit, S. J. Rosenbaum, A. Bockisch, and G. Antoch Can PET/CT Replace Separate Diagnostic CT for Cancer Imaging? Optimizing CT Protocols for Imaging Cancers of the Chest and Abdomen J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 45S - 57S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
