HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Connell, D. A. Articles by Bass, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Connell, D. A. Articles by Bass, C. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Longitudinal Study Comparing Sonographic and MRI Assessments of Acute and Healing Hamstring Injuries

¹ Department of Medical Imaging, Victoria House Hospital, 316 Malvern Rd., Prahran 3181, Australia.
² Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3144, Australia.
³ Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Monash University, Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3144, Australia.

OBJECTIVE. We compared sonography and MRI for assessing hamstring injuries in professional football players (Australian football) 3 days, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks after an injury and identified imaging characteristics at baseline that may be useful in predicting the time needed for return to competition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty men who are professional football players presented with suspected acute hamstring strain underwent sonography and MRI within 3 days of injury; those who were injured returned 2 and 6 weeks later for follow-up MRI and sonography. Two radiologists interpreted either the MR images or the sonograms and were blinded to the results of the other technique. The following six parameters were measured at each assessment: the muscle injured, the site of injury within the muscle, the longitudinal injury length (expressed in millimeters), the cross-sectional injured area (expressed as a percentage), and the presence of interand intramuscular hematoma.

RESULTS. At baseline, MRI identified abnormalities in 42 (70.0%) of 60 patients, whereas sonography found abnormalities in 45 (75%) of 60. At 2 weeks, 29 (59.2%) of 49 scans showed abnormalities on MRI and 25 (51.0%) of 49 showed abnormalities on sonograms. Of those players who were injured at baseline, 15 (35.7%) of 42 and 10 (22.2%) of 45 still showed abnormal results on scans at 6 weeks on MRI and sonography, respectively. However, all but one player had returned to competition. The biceps femoris was the most commonly injured muscle and the musculotendinous junction was the most common site of injury. Injuries appeared significantly larger on MRI than on sonography at all time points. Our analysis showed that at baseline, the longitudinal length of hamstring tear on MRI had the highest statistical correlation with recovery (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001) and was the best radiologic predictor for return to competition.

CONCLUSION. Sonography is as useful as MRI in depicting acute hamstring injuries and because of lower costs may be the preferred imaging technique. However, MRI is more sensitive for follow-up imaging of healing injuries. The longitudinal length of the strain as measured on MRI is a strong predictor for the amount of time needed until an athlete can return to competition.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Sarimo, L. Lempainen, K. Mattila, and S. Orava Complete Proximal Hamstring Avulsions: A Series of 41 Patients With Operative Treatment Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1110 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Askling, M. Tengvar, T. Saartok, and A. Thorstensson Acute First-Time Hamstring Strains During Slow-Speed Stretching: Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Recovery Characteristics Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1716 - 1724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Koulouris, D. A. Connell, P. Brukner, and M. Schneider-Kolsky Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Assessing Risk of Recurrent Hamstring Injuries in Elite Athletes Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1500 - 1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Askling, M. Tengvar, T. Saartok, and A. Thorstensson Acute First-Time Hamstring Strains During High-Speed Running: A Longitudinal Study Including Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. H. Oztekin, H. Boya, B. Zeren, M. Schneider-Kolsky, P. Warren, and D. Connell Letters to the Editor * Authors' Response Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2007; 35(1): 149 - 150. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Connell, K. Ali, M. Javid, P. Bell, M. Batt, and S. Kemp Sonography and MRI of rectus abdominis muscle strain in elite tennis players. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1457 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Schneider-Kolsky, J. L. Hoving, P. Warren, and D. A. Connell A Comparison Between Clinical Assessment and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Hamstring Injuries Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 1008 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Askling, T Saartok, and A Thorstensson Type of acute hamstring strain affects flexibility, strength, and time to return to pre-injury level Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Petersen and P Holmich Evidence based prevention of hamstring injuries in sport Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2005; 39(6): 319 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Koulouris and D. Connell Hamstring Muscle Complex: An Imaging Review RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 571 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]