AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connell, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bass, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connell, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bass, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:975-984
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Longitudinal Study Comparing Sonographic and MRI Assessments of Acute and Healing Hamstring Injuries

David A. Connell1, Michal E. Schneider-Kolsky1, Jan Lucas Hoving2, Frank Malara1, Rachelle Buchbinder3, George Koulouris1, Frank Burke1 and Cheryl Bass1

1 Department of Medical Imaging, Victoria House Hospital, 316 Malvern Rd., Prahran 3181, Australia.
2 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3144, Australia.
3 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Monash University, Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3144, Australia.

OBJECTIVE. We compared sonography and MRI for assessing hamstring injuries in professional football players (Australian football) 3 days, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks after an injury and identified imaging characteristics at baseline that may be useful in predicting the time needed for return to competition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty men who are professional football players presented with suspected acute hamstring strain underwent sonography and MRI within 3 days of injury; those who were injured returned 2 and 6 weeks later for follow-up MRI and sonography. Two radiologists interpreted either the MR images or the sonograms and were blinded to the results of the other technique. The following six parameters were measured at each assessment: the muscle injured, the site of injury within the muscle, the longitudinal injury length (expressed in millimeters), the cross-sectional injured area (expressed as a percentage), and the presence of interand intramuscular hematoma.

RESULTS. At baseline, MRI identified abnormalities in 42 (70.0%) of 60 patients, whereas sonography found abnormalities in 45 (75%) of 60. At 2 weeks, 29 (59.2%) of 49 scans showed abnormalities on MRI and 25 (51.0%) of 49 showed abnormalities on sonograms. Of those players who were injured at baseline, 15 (35.7%) of 42 and 10 (22.2%) of 45 still showed abnormal results on scans at 6 weeks on MRI and sonography, respectively. However, all but one player had returned to competition. The biceps femoris was the most commonly injured muscle and the musculotendinous junction was the most common site of injury. Injuries appeared significantly larger on MRI than on sonography at all time points. Our analysis showed that at baseline, the longitudinal length of hamstring tear on MRI had the highest statistical correlation with recovery (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001) and was the best radiologic predictor for return to competition.

CONCLUSION. Sonography is as useful as MRI in depicting acute hamstring injuries and because of lower costs may be the preferred imaging technique. However, MRI is more sensitive for follow-up imaging of healing injuries. The longitudinal length of the strain as measured on MRI is a strong predictor for the amount of time needed until an athlete can return to competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Saupe, L. M. White, J. Stainsby, G. Tomlinson, and M. S. Sussman
Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tractography of Skeletal Muscle: Optimization of b Value for Imaging at 1.5 T
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): W282 - W290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary ApproachHome page
M. Prior, M. Guerin, and K. Grimmer
An Evidence-Based Approach to Hamstring Strain Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, March 1, 2009; 1(2): 154 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. Sarimo, L. Lempainen, K. Mattila, and S. Orava
Complete Proximal Hamstring Avulsions: A Series of 41 Patients With Operative Treatment
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1110 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. M. Askling, M. Tengvar, T. Saartok, and A. Thorstensson
Acute First-Time Hamstring Strains During Slow-Speed Stretching: Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Recovery Characteristics
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1716 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. Koulouris, D. A. Connell, P. Brukner, and M. Schneider-Kolsky
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Assessing Risk of Recurrent Hamstring Injuries in Elite Athletes
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1500 - 1506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. M. Askling, M. Tengvar, T. Saartok, and A. Thorstensson
Acute First-Time Hamstring Strains During High-Speed Running: A Longitudinal Study Including Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 197 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. H. Oztekin, H. Boya, B. Zeren, M. Schneider-Kolsky, P. Warren, and D. Connell
Letters to the Editor * Authors' Response
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2007; 35(1): 149 - 150.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Connell, K. Ali, M. Javid, P. Bell, M. Batt, and S. Kemp
Sonography and MRI of rectus abdominis muscle strain in elite tennis players.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1457 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. E. Schneider-Kolsky, J. L. Hoving, P. Warren, and D. A. Connell
A Comparison Between Clinical Assessment and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Hamstring Injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 1008 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
C Askling, T Saartok, and A Thorstensson
Type of acute hamstring strain affects flexibility, strength, and time to return to pre-injury level
Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 40 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
J Petersen and P Holmich
Evidence based prevention of hamstring injuries in sport
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2005; 39(6): 319 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. Koulouris and D. Connell
Hamstring Muscle Complex: An Imaging Review
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 571 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.