|
|
||||||||
1 All authors: Interventional Ultrasound Service, D. Cotugno Hospital, Via Quagliariello 54, Naples 84100, Italy.
OBJECTIVE. We sought to investigate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography using a second-generation contrast agent for the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis by comparing the results to those obtained with contrast-enhanced helical CT.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Between October 2002 and March 2003, 74 patients with cirrhosis (60 men and 14 women; age range, 47-80 years; mean age, 67 years) who had a single nodule of hepatocellular carcinoma were selected to be studied from a cohort of 437 patients with cirrhosis. The size range of the 74 nodules was 9-65 mm (mean, 28.2 mm). Twenty-eight (38%) were 20 mm smaller (range, 9-20 mm; mean, 16.6 mm), and 46 (62%) were larger than 20 mm (range, 21-65 mm; mean, 35.2 mm). Contrast-enhanced sonography was performed at a low mechanical index after IV administration of the contrast agent SonoVue. CT scans were obtained in all patients. The enhancement pattern related to tumor hypervascularity was analyzed. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS. For the 28 hepatocellular carcinomas 20 mm or smaller, contrast-enhanced sonography showed 15 (53.6%) as hypervascular and 10 (35.7%) as avascular; three (10.7%) carcinomas were missed. On CT, 12 (42.9%) of the 28 hepatocellular carcinomas appeared hypervascular, 13 (46.4%) appeared hypovascular, and three (10.7%) were missed. For the 46 hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 20 mm, contrast-enhanced sonography showed 42 (91.3%) as hypervascular and four (8.7%) as avascular. On CT, 35 (76.1%) hepatocellular carcinomas appeared hypervascular, eight (17.4%) appeared hypovascular, and three (6.5%) were missed. Differences between CT appearance of hepatocellular carcinomas and contrast-enhanced sonographic appearance of the carcinomas were not statistically significant. Concordance between contrast-enhanced sonographic and CT appearances was observed in 61 (82.4%) of 74 cases.
CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced sonography is similar to CT for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma hypervascularity. It could be complementary to conventional unenhanced sonography for evaluation of liver nodules.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Quaia, M. D'Onofrio, P. Cabassa, F. Vecchiato, S. Caffarri, F. Pittiani, K. M. Wittkowski, and M. A. Cova Diagnostic Value of Hepatocellular Nodule Vascularity After Microbubble Injection for Characterizing Malignancy in Patients with Cirrhosis Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1474 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson Enhancement Patterns of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Contrast-enhanced US: Comparison with Histologic Differentiation Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 898 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Wilson, T. K. Kim, H.-J. Jang, and P. N. Burns Enhancement Patterns of Focal Liver Masses: Discordance Between Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): W7 - W12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-X. Xu, G.-J. Liu, M.-D. Lu, X.-Y. Xie, Z.-F. Xu, Y.-L. Zheng, and J.-Y. Liang Characterization of Small Focal Liver Lesions Using Real-time Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: Diagnostic Performance Analysis in 200 Patients. J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2006; 25(3): 349 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ferraioli, A. Di Sarno, C. Coppola, and A. Giorgio Contrast-Enhanced Low-Mechanical-Index Ultrasonography in Hepatic Splenosis J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 133 - 136. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |