AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giorgio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Del Viscovo, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giorgio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Del Viscovo, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 183:1319-1326
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Contrast-Enhanced Sonographic Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Helical CT Appearance

Antonio Giorgio1, Giovanna Ferraioli, Luciano Tarantino, Giorgio de Stefano, Vincenzo Scala, Ferdinando Scarano, Carmine Coppola and Luca Del Viscovo

1 All authors: Interventional Ultrasound Service, D. Cotugno Hospital, Via Quagliariello 54, Naples 84100, Italy.

OBJECTIVE. We sought to investigate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography using a second-generation contrast agent for the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis by comparing the results to those obtained with contrast-enhanced helical CT.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Between October 2002 and March 2003, 74 patients with cirrhosis (60 men and 14 women; age range, 47-80 years; mean age, 67 years) who had a single nodule of hepatocellular carcinoma were selected to be studied from a cohort of 437 patients with cirrhosis. The size range of the 74 nodules was 9-65 mm (mean, 28.2 mm). Twenty-eight (38%) were 20 mm smaller (range, 9-20 mm; mean, 16.6 mm), and 46 (62%) were larger than 20 mm (range, 21-65 mm; mean, 35.2 mm). Contrast-enhanced sonography was performed at a low mechanical index after IV administration of the contrast agent SonoVue. CT scans were obtained in all patients. The enhancement pattern related to tumor hypervascularity was analyzed. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS. For the 28 hepatocellular carcinomas 20 mm or smaller, contrast-enhanced sonography showed 15 (53.6%) as hypervascular and 10 (35.7%) as avascular; three (10.7%) carcinomas were missed. On CT, 12 (42.9%) of the 28 hepatocellular carcinomas appeared hypervascular, 13 (46.4%) appeared hypovascular, and three (10.7%) were missed. For the 46 hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 20 mm, contrast-enhanced sonography showed 42 (91.3%) as hypervascular and four (8.7%) as avascular. On CT, 35 (76.1%) hepatocellular carcinomas appeared hypervascular, eight (17.4%) appeared hypovascular, and three (6.5%) were missed. Differences between CT appearance of hepatocellular carcinomas and contrast-enhanced sonographic appearance of the carcinomas were not statistically significant. Concordance between contrast-enhanced sonographic and CT appearances was observed in 61 (82.4%) of 74 cases.

CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced sonography is similar to CT for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma hypervascularity. It could be complementary to conventional unenhanced sonography for evaluation of liver nodules.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Quaia, M. D'Onofrio, P. Cabassa, F. Vecchiato, S. Caffarri, F. Pittiani, K. M. Wittkowski, and M. A. Cova
Diagnostic Value of Hepatocellular Nodule Vascularity After Microbubble Injection for Characterizing Malignancy in Patients with Cirrhosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1474 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Enhancement Patterns of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Contrast-enhanced US: Comparison with Histologic Differentiation
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 898 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. R. Wilson, T. K. Kim, H.-J. Jang, and P. N. Burns
Enhancement Patterns of Focal Liver Masses: Discordance Between Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): W7 - W12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H.-X. Xu, G.-J. Liu, M.-D. Lu, X.-Y. Xie, Z.-F. Xu, Y.-L. Zheng, and J.-Y. Liang
Characterization of Small Focal Liver Lesions Using Real-time Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: Diagnostic Performance Analysis in 200 Patients.
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2006; 25(3): 349 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
G. Ferraioli, A. Di Sarno, C. Coppola, and A. Giorgio
Contrast-Enhanced Low-Mechanical-Index Ultrasonography in Hepatic Splenosis
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 133 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.