HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yoon, C. J. Articles by Sung, K.-B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yoon, C. J. Articles by Sung, K.-B. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Removal of Retrievable Esophageal and Gastrointestinal Stents: Experience in 113 Patients

¹ All authors: Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, 388-1, Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, South Korea.

OBJECTIVE. Although there are frequent clinical situations in which esophageal and gastrointestinal stents should be removed, nonsurgical stent removal has been difficult. The purpose of our study was to describe the safety and efficacy of removing the retrievable nitinol stents with a retrieval hook.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the removal of 119 esophageal, six gastroduodenal, and five rectal retrievable stents was attempted in 113 patients using a retrieval hook. Indications for stent removal included migration (n = 35), severe pain (n = 23), formation of a new stricture (n = 13), incomplete stent expansion (n = 7), airway compression (n = 2), esophagorespiratory fistula (n = 2), malpositioned stent (n = 1), and hematemesis (n = 1). The remaining 46 stents were electively removed.

RESULTS. Of the 130 stents, 127 (97.7%) were successfully removed despite the following difficulties: untied drawstrings (n = 4), separation of the stent (n = 3), and fracture (n = 2) or disconnection (n = 2) of a retrieval hook. The removal procedure failed in three cases (2.3%). The causes of failure were the inability to place the hook into the migrated stent (n = 2) and a tight stricture above the migrated stent (n = 1). The procedure-related complications included minor (n = 4) and major (n = 1) bleeding and intramural rupture (n = 3). One patient died of major bleeding after removal of an esophageal stent.

CONCLUSION. The stent retrieval hook is useful for removing retrievable esophageal and gastrointestinal stents.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?