AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishigami, K.
Right arrow Articles by Stolpen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishigami, K.
Right arrow Articles by Stolpen, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2004; 183:1577-1584
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Does Variant Hepatic Artery Anatomy in a Liver Transplant Recipient Increase the Risk of Hepatic Artery Complications After Transplantation?

Kousei Ishigami1, Yan Zhang1, Stephen Rayhill2, Daniel Katz2 and Alan Stolpen1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr., 3885 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242-1077.
2 Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, IA City, Iowa 52242-1077.

OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to determine whether variant hepatic artery anatomy in a liver transplant recipient increases the risk of hepatic artery complications after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study group consisted of 84 patients who underwent gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography before orthotopic liver transplantation in which a branch patch arterial anastomosis at the gastroduodenal takeoff was used. MR angiography studies were retrospectively reviewed and assessed for the presence and type of variant hepatic artery anatomy. The diameter of the distal common hepatic artery was measured. The incidence of posttransplantation hepatic artery stenosis or thrombosis was assessed.

RESULTS. Seven (8.3%) of the 84 patients developed hepatic artery complications after transplantation. Of the 24 patients with variant hepatic artery anatomy, five (20.8%) had posttransplantation/ hepatic artery complications. In contrast, only two (3.3%) of the 60 patients with classic hepatic artery anatomy had complications. The higher complication rate in patients with variant hepatic artery anatomy was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The odds ratio was 7.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.4–42.6). The diameter of the distal common hepatic artery was smaller in patients with variant hepatic artery anatomy compared with those with classic hepatic artery anatomy (range, 4.3–7.1 mm [mean, 5.8 mm] vs 4.0–8.9 mm [mean 6.3 mm], p < 0.05), and it was also smaller in patients who had posttransplantation hepatic artery complications compared with those who had no complications (range, 4.2–6.3 mm [mean, 5.2 mm] vs 4.0–8.9 mm, [mean, 6.2 mm], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION. Variant hepatic artery anatomy in a liver transplant recipient increased the risk of hepatic artery complications after transplantation. The smaller caliber of the native common hepatic artery may contribute to the higher risk.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.