AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tekes, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tekes, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:121-127
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Dynamic MRI of Bladder Cancer: Evaluation of Staging Accuracy

Aylin Tekes1, Ihab Kamel1, Khursheed Imam1, Gilberto Szarf1, Mark Schoenberg2, Khurram Nasir3, Richard Thompson4 and David Bluemke1

1 Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St., Ste. 3235A, Baltimore, MD 21287.
2 Department of Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
3 Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21287.
4 Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of gadoliniumenhanced MRI in staging bladder cancer in a series of patients with surgically proven bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy-one patients with biopsy-proven bladder cancer underwent MRI on a 1.5-T scanner with a phased-array pelvic coil. Conventional T1-weighted spin-echo, T2-weighted spin-echo, and unenhanced and enhanced (0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium) fast spoiled gradient-echo images with fat suppression were obtained. Two blinded reviewers evaluated the MR images and assigned a stage that was compared with the pathologic stage (n = 67) or with clinical follow-up for at least 2 years after MRI (n = 4).

RESULTS. Agreement among the reviewers was good in assigning a radiologic stage for bladder cancer (kappa = 0.80). On a stage-by-stage basis, MRI accuracy was 62%, and overstaging was the most common error (32%). Staging accuracy improved to 85% and 82% in differentiating superficial from invasive tumors and organ-confined from non-organ-confined tumors, respectively. The time interval between MRI and transurethral resection (≤ 60 days and ≥ 61 days) was not a statistically significant factor in differentiating superficial from invasive and organ-confined from non-organ-confined tumors (p > 0.05). MRI accuracy in staging transitional cell carcinoma was not significantly different from that obtained in staging non–transitional cell carcinoma (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION. MRI shows good reproducibility between reviewers for staging bladder cancer. Although overall staging accuracy was only moderate, the accuracy for differentiating superficial versus invasive disease and organ-confined versus non-organ-confined disease was high.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Watanabe, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, S. Goshima, Y. Tsuge, M. Onozuka, and N. Moriyama
Preoperative T Staging of Urinary Bladder Cancer: Does Diffusion-Weighted MRI Have Supplementary Value?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): 1361 - 1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Tuncbilek, M. Kaplan, S. Altaner, I. H. Atakan, N. Sut, O. Inci, and M. K. Demir
Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Correlation with Tumor Angiogenesis in Bladder Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 949 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Takeuchi, S. Sasaki, M. Ito, S. Okada, S. Takahashi, T. Kawai, K. Suzuki, H. Oshima, M. Hara, and Y. Shibamoto
Urinary Bladder Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging--Accuracy for Diagnosing T Stage and Estimating Histologic Grade
Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 112 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
N Bharwani, N J Stephens, and S D Heenan
Imaging of bladder cancer
Imaging, June 1, 2008; 20(2): 97 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. Ozden, A. T. Turgut, M. Yesil, C. Gogus, and O. Gogus
A New Parameter for Staging Bladder Carcinoma: Ultrasonographic Contact Length and Height-to-Length Ratio
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2007; 26(9): 1137 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. J. Wong-You-Cheong, P. J. Woodward, M. A. Manning, and I. A. Sesterhenn
From the Archives of the AFIP: Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 553 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.