| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital,
9200 W Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226.
2 Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
53226.
3 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine if 3D-rendered CT urography (CTU) depicts both normal and abnormal findings in patients with urinary diversions and if the addition of contrast-enhanced CT digital radiography (CTDR) improves opacification of the urinary collecting system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty CTU and contrast-enhanced CTDR examinations were performed in 24 patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer. Indications for evaluation included hematuria, tumor surveillance, or suspected diversion malfunction. All examinations were evaluated without knowledge of the stage or grade of a patient's tumor and were compared with the clinical records. Opacification of the urinary collecting system was evaluated with 3D CTU alone, contrast-enhanced CTDR alone, and combined CTU and CTDR.
RESULTS. Nine abnormalities were identified including distal ureteral strictures (n = 4), vascular compression of the mid left ureter (n = 1), scarring of the mid right pole infundibulum (n = 1), bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter (n = 1), urinary reservoir calculus (n = 1), and tumor recurrence invading the afferent limb of the neobladder (n = 1). Eight of the nine detected abnormalities were surgically or pathologically confirmed. All abnormalities were identified on all three imaging techniques but were best seen on 3D CTU and enhanced CTDR images. Incomplete opacification of the urinary collecting system occurred in 17 patients with CTU alone, 12 patients with contrast-enhanced CTDR alone, and nine patients with combined CTU and contrast-enhanced CTDR. Compared with CTU alone, the combined technique of 3D CTU and contrast-enhanced CTDR improved opacification by a statistically significant difference (p = 0.037).
CONCLUSION. CTU with 3D rendering can accurately depict both normal and abnormal postoperative findings in patients with urinary diversions. Adding enhanced CTDR can improve visualization of the urinary collecting system.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  V. Catala, M. Sola, J. Samaniego, T. Marti, J. Huguet, J. Palou, and P. De La Torre CT Findings in Urinary Diversion after Radical Cystectomy: Postsurgical Anatomy and Complications1 RadioGraphics, March 1, 2009; 29(2): 461 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. G. Silverman, J. R. Leyendecker, and E. S. Amis Jr What Is the Current Role of CT Urography and MR Urography in the Evaluation of the Urinary Tract? Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 309 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J Richenberg Haematuria Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 57 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. S. Sudakoff, D. P. Dunn, R. S. Hellman, M. A. Laguna, C. R. Wilson, R. W. Prost, D. C. Eastwood, and H. J. Lim Opacification of the Genitourinary Collecting System During MDCT Urography with Enhanced CT Digital Radiography: Nonsaline Versus Saline Bolus Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 122 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Richenberg and P Thompson Haematuria Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 34 - 43. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
