HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, J. S. Articles by Coakley, F. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, J. S. Articles by Coakley, F. V. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Concordance of Second-Order Portal Venous and Biliary Tract Anatomies on MDCT Angiography and MDCT Cholangiography

¹ Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0628, C-324C, 505 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143-0628.
² Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628.

OBJECTIVE. We sought to investigate the concordance between second-order portal venous and biliary tract anatomies using MDCT angiography and MDCT cholangiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively identified 56 living related potential liver donors who underwent both MDCT angiography and MDCT cholangiography. Two reviewers independently rated axial images and 3D reconstructions of MDCT angiograms and cholangiograms as diagnostic or nondiagnostic with respect to depiction of second-order portal venous and biliary tract anatomies. In images rated as diagnostic, second-order portal venous and biliary tract anatomies were categorized as conventional or variant. The concordance between portal venous and biliary tract anatomies was analyzed using McNemar exact chi-square test.

RESULTS. All examinations were diagnostic. Second-order portal venous variants were seen in 10 (18%) and biliary branch variants were seen in 23 (41%) of the 56 patients. Patients with variant portal venous anatomy (6/10, 60%) were more likely to have variant biliary tract anatomy than patients with conventional portal venous anatomy (17/46, 37%; p < 0.01). The sensitivity of variant portal venous anatomy as a marker for variant biliary anatomy was 26% (6/23 patients).

CONCLUSION. Concordance between second-order portal venous and biliary tract anatomies is statistically significant. However, in our series, a number of patients with conventional portal venous anatomy had variant biliary anatomy; therefore, the finding of conventional portal venous anatomy does not obviate preoperative biliary tract imaging in patients before liver donation.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. M. Yeh, F. V. Coakley, A. C. Westphalen, B. N. Joe, C. E. Freise, A. Qayyum, R. A. McTaggart, and J. P. Roberts Predicting Biliary Complications in Right Lobe Liver Transplant Recipients according to Distance between Donor's Bile Duct and Corresponding Hepatic Artery Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 144 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]