AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weidekamm, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weidekamm, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bader, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2005; 184:505-510
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Effects of TIPS on Liver Perfusion Measured by Dynamic CT

Claudia Weidekamm1, Manfred Cejna1, Ludwig Kramer2, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic2 and Till R. Bader1

1 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna A-1090, Austria.
2 Department of Internal Medicine IV, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Vienna, Austria.

OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to measure the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver parenchyma with dynamic, single-section CT in patients with liver cirrhosis before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and to compare the results with normal values.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Perfusion of the liver parenchyma was measured in 24 healthy volunteers and 41 patients with liver cirrhosis using dynamic single-section CT. Seventeen patients underwent TIPS placement, and CT measurements were repeated within 7 days. CT scans were obtained at a single level comprising the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over a period of 88 sec (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 sec and eight scans every 7 sec) beginning with the injection of a contrast agent bolus (40 mL at 10 mL/sec). Parenchymal and vascular contrast enhancement was measured with regions of interest, and time–density curves were obtained. These data were processed with a pharmaco-dynamic fitting program (TopFit), and the arterial and portal venous component and the total perfusion of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated (milliliters of perfusion per minute per 100 mL of tissue).

RESULTS. Mean normal values for hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion were 20, 102, and 122 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively. In patients with cirrhosis before TIPS, mean hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion was 28, 63, and 91 mL/min per 100 mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for all values (p < 0.05). After TIPS, hepatic perfusion increased to a mean value of 48, 65, 113 mL/min per 100 mL for arterial (p < 0.01), portal venous, and total (p = 0.011) perfusion, respectively.

CONCLUSION. In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic arterial perfusion increased, whereas portal venous and total perfusion decreased compared with that of healthy volunteers. TIPS placement caused a statistically significant increase of the hepatic arterial and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous parenchymal perfusion remained unchanged.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Tsushima, K. Endo, C. Weidekamm, and T. Bader
Portal Perfusion Measurement on Dynamic CT in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 813 - 813.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.