| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226-3596.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to investigate clinician response and patient outcome associated with the radiologist's report of isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli (ISSPE) or indeterminate or inconclusive results on MDCT for venous thromboembolism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. All patients were examined using 8- or 16-MDCT. Reported findings on combined CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography of 1,435 consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively. The charts of patients of interest with ISSPE or with indeterminate or inconclusive pulmonary embolism results were analyzed for clinician response and recurrent symptoms of venous thromboembolism in both treated and untreated patients during the following 3 months.
RESULTS. We studied 207 patients of interest, and follow-up was available on 192 (92.8%) (67 ISSPEs, 125 inconclusive). Of the 192 patients, 25 (37%) of 67 patients with ISSPE and 108 (86%) of 125 patients with inconclusive results did not receive anticoagulation. Two patients with ISSPE and two patients with inconclusive results returned with new symptoms suggesting recurrent venous thromboembolism, but no venous thromboembolism was found. Thirteen (10%) of 133 untreated patients died without clinical evidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism. In 61 patients who received anticoagulation (42/67 [63%] ISSPE and 17/125 [14%] inconclusive), five patients returned with venous thromboembolism symptoms. None had recurrent emboli. Two (3%) of 61 patients who received anticoagulation died of other diseases.
CONCLUSION. Patients with ISSPE more commonly received anticoagulation than not. In the patients who did not receive anticoagulation, no recurrent pulmonary embolism was identified on follow-up. In most patients with inconclusive findings on CT pulmonary angiography, clinicians chose to withhold anticoagulation without additional imaging workup. No adverse effects of this clinical decision were uncovered.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Nazaroglu, C. A. Ozmen, H. O. Akay, I. Kilinc, and A. Bilici 64-MDCT Pulmonary Angiography and CT Venography in the Diagnosis of Thromboembolic Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 654 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. R. Goodman, H. D. Sostman, P. D. Stein, and P. K. Woodard CT Venography: A Necessary Adjunct to CT Pulmonary Angiography or a Waste of Time, Money, and Radiation? Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 327 - 330. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Authors/Task Force Members, A. Torbicki, A. Perrier, S. Konstantinides, G. Agnelli, N. Galie, P. Pruszczyk, F. Bengel, A. J.B. Brady, D. Ferreira, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2008; 29(18): 2276 - 2315. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P U Dalal Non-metastatic manifestations of cancer in the chest Imaging, September 1, 2008; 20(3): 194 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. J. Pipavath and J. D. Godwin Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism: A Historical Perspective Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 639 - 641. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Remy-Jardin, M. Pistolesi, L. R. Goodman, W. B. Gefter, A. Gottschalk, J. R. Mayo, and H. D. Sostman Management of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of CT Angiography: A Statement from the Fleischner Society Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 315 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. G. Cronin, D. G. Lohan, M. Keane, C. Roche, and J. M. Murphy Prevalence and Significance of Asymptomatic Venous Thromboembolic Disease Found on Oncologic Staging CT Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 162 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. R Desai Unsuspected pulmonary embolism on CT scanning: yet another headache for clinicians? Thorax, June 1, 2007; 62(6): 470 - 472. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B. Segal, J. Eng, L. J. Tamariz, and E. B. Bass Review of the Evidence on Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2007; 5(1): 63 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. W. Gladish, D. H. Choe, E. M. Marom, B. S. Sabloff, L. D. Broemeling, and R. F. Munden Incidental Pulmonary Emboli in Oncology Patients: Prevalence, CT Evaluation, and Natural History Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 246 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Landay, L. R. Goodman, B. Eyer, and L. Washington Clinical Evidence of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Who Did Not Receive Anticoagulant Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 813 - 814. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
