HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, H. L. Articles by Wang, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, H. L. Articles by Wang, Y. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Diagnostic Accuracy of Time-Resolved 2D Projection MR Angiography for Symptomatic Infrapopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease

¹ All authors: Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 416 E 55^th St., Cornell MRI, New York, NY 10022.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography in detecting calf and pedal artery occlusive disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Time-resolved MR angiography of calf and pedal arteries was performed on 59 symptomatic legs of 52 patients using the head coil and bolus injections of 6 mL of gadolinium contrast medium. Selective X-ray digital subtraction angiography was performed within 30 days after MR angiography. Calf and pedal arteries were divided into 10 segments. X-ray digital subtraction angiography and MR angiography images were retrospectively interpreted by three expert observers, who graded segments as having no significant stenosis, significant stenosis (> 50%), or occlusion. The accuracy of MR angiography interpretations was compared with the accuracy of consensus X-ray digital subtraction angiography interpretations as the standard of reference. Arterial segments with discrepant grading on X-ray digital subtraction angiography and MR angiography were reviewed again to determine the reasons for disagreement.

RESULTS. Arterial phase MR angiography images free of venous contamination were obtained in every case. The agreement between MR angiography and X-ray digital subtraction angiography in depicting infrapopliteal arterial disease was fair to good ( = 0.44–0.92). Overall sensitivity and specificity were 83% and 87%, respectively, for detecting significant stenosis of calf and pedal arteries and 86% and 93%, respectively, for detecting occlusions. Accuracy was higher in the larger vessels—for example, calf (84%) compared with foot (71%). In 21% (22/105) of the segments graded differently on MR angiography than on X-ray digital subtraction angiography, it was believed that MR angiography was more likely to be correct than X-ray digital subtraction angiography because of visualization of late-filling arteries on MR angiography that did not opacify on X-ray digital subtraction angiography.

CONCLUSION. Time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography accurately evaluates calf and pedal arteries without degradation from venous contamination.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Y. Kim, R. A. Mirza, J. A. Bryant, E. D. Whiting, D. M. Delong, C. E. Spritzer, and E. M. Merkle Central Veins of the Chest: Evaluation with Time-resolved MR Angiography Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 558 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Kramer, M. J. Budoff, Z. A. Fayad, V. A. Ferrari, C. Goldman, J. R. Lesser, E. T. Martin, S. Rajagopalan, J. P. Reilly, G. P. Rodgers, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on vascular imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2007; 12(4): 359 - 378. [PDF]

				M. B. Blum, M. Schmook, R. Schernthaner, G. Edelhauser, S. Puchner, J. Lammer, and M. A. Funovics Quantification and Detectability of In-Stent Stenosis with CT Angiography and MR Angiography in Arterial Stents In Vitro Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1238 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Kramer, M. J. Budoff, Z. A. Fayad, V. A. Ferrari, C. Goldman, J. R. Lesser, E. T. Martin, S. Rajagopalan, J. P. Reilly, G. P. Rodgers, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on Vascular Imaging With Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 11, 2007; 50(11): 1097 - 1114. [Full Text] [PDF]