|
|
||||||||
Original Report |
1 Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus
Ave., Box 0628, M-372, San Francisco, CA, 941430628.
2 Present address: Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical
SchoolMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 260 Longwood Ave., Rm.
213, Boston, MA 02115.
OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to determine the supplemental value of MRI in fetal abdominal disease detected on prenatal sonography.
CONCLUSION. Our preliminary results suggest the primary supplemental value of MRI relative to sonography in fetal abdominal disease lies in improved tissue characterization rather than in improved anatomic characterization.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Davis, Y. Blumenfeld, E. Rubesova, C. Abrajano, Y. Y. El-Sayed, S. Dutta, R. A. Barth, and S. R. Hintz Challenges of Giant Omphalocele: From Fetal Diagnosis to Follow-up NeoReviews, August 1, 2008; 9(8): e338 - e347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |