|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National
University Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South
Korea.
2 Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of
Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced agent detection sonographic imaging to characterize focal hepatic lesions in patients with diffuse liver disease in comparison with baseline sonographic images and to determine whether agent detection imaging can reduce the necessity of further diagnostic workup for lesion characterization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Contrast-enhanced sonography using 4 g of Levovist at a concentration of 300 mg/mL was performed on 75 focal hepatic lesions in 75 patients with diffuse liver disease. Interval reviews for both baseline without and with contrast-enhanced sonography were performed independently by two radiologists. They were requested to determine the malignity of focal hepatic lesions using a 5-point confidence level and to record the specific diagnoses and the necessity for further imaging for lesion characterization. Radiologists' performances for lesion differentiation using baseline and contrast-enhanced sonography were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Interobserver agreement was also analyzed.
RESULTS. When contrast-enhanced sonography was used, ROC analysis
revealed a significant improvement for both reviewers (area under the receiver
operating characteristic curve [Az] = 0.753 and 0.830 and
0.971 and 0.974 at baseline sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography,
respectively; p < 0.002) for differentiating malignant and benign
focal liver lesions. Contrast-enhanced sonography also improved specificity
from 12% to 91% for reviewer 1 and from 26% to 85% for reviewer 2 compared
with baseline sonography. Furthermore, excellent interobserver agreement was
achieved for contrast-enhanced sonography (weighted
= 0.919), whereas
only good agreement was achieved for baseline sonography (weighted
=
0.656). A better result for specific diagnosis was obtained by
contrast-enhanced sonography (79% and 75%) than by baseline sonography (37%
and 48%, p < 0.05). Contrast-enhanced sonography (72% and 63%)
outperformed baseline sonography (35% and 28%, p < 0.05) as a
confirmatory imaging technique.
CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced agent detection sonography can be used to characterize focal hepatic lesions in patients with diffuse liver disease reliably and with a higher diagnostic confidence than baseline sonography. Furthermore, contrast-enhanced sonography reduced the need for further diagnostic workups for focal hepatic lesion characterization.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Quaia, M. D'Onofrio, P. Cabassa, F. Vecchiato, S. Caffarri, F. Pittiani, K. M. Wittkowski, and M. A. Cova Diagnostic Value of Hepatocellular Nodule Vascularity After Microbubble Injection for Characterizing Malignancy in Patients with Cirrhosis Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1474 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tarantino Utility of Sonography in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): W494 - W494. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Lee Reply Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): W495 - W495. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. Y. Lee, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi Contrast-Enhanced Sonography of Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen in Six Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 422 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-X. Xu, G.-J. Liu, M.-D. Lu, X.-Y. Xie, Z.-F. Xu, Y.-L. Zheng, and J.-Y. Liang Characterization of Small Focal Liver Lesions Using Real-time Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: Diagnostic Performance Analysis in 200 Patients. J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2006; 25(3): 349 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |