AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aide, N.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, J.-N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aide, N.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, J.-N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:1172-1177
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Persistent Foreign Body Reaction Around Inguinal Mesh Prostheses: A Potential Pitfall of FDG PET

Nicolas Aide1, Jean-François Deux2, Iliana Peretti1, Laurence Mabille3, Jacques Mandet4, Patrice Callard5 and Jean-Noël Talbot1

1 Hôpitaux de Paris PET Center, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.
2 Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
3 Paris Nord PET Center, Sarcelles, France.
4 Department of Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
5 Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.

OBJECTIVE. FDG PET has been recognized as an efficient imaging technique for the treatment of oncology patients. However, false-positive results can occur. The purpose of this study is to describe three oncology patients with persistent FDG up-take around inguinal mesh prostheses that occurred up to 10 years after the surgical repair of inguinal hernias and led to false-positive results.

CONCLUSION. Remote mesh prostheses can induce FDG uptake because of persistent foreign body reaction. Consequently, each time an unexpected pelvic focus is noticed on FDG PET, the medical history of patients should be carefully reviewed to avoid false-positive results.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. M. Costelloe, W. A. Murphy Jr., and B. A. Chasen
Musculoskeletal Pitfalls in 18F-FDG PET/CT: Pictorial Review
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3_Supplement): WS1 - WS13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.