AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bredella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bredella, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2005; 184:1199-1204
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Value of FDG PET in the Assessment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Miriam A. Bredella1,2, Lynne Steinbach1, Gary Caputo2, George Segall3 and Randall Hawkins2

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman St., WACC 515, Boston, MA 02114.
2 Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628.
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to evaluate if whole-body PET with FDG is able to detect bone marrow involvement in patients with multiple myeloma and to assess its appearance and distribution pattern.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventeen whole-body FDG PET scans were performed in 13 patients with multiple myeloma. Four patients were referred for evaluation of extent of disease pretherapy and nine patients were referred for assessment of therapy response (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, bone marrow transplant). FDG PET images were evaluated for distribution and uptake pattern. Standardized uptake values were obtained to quantify FDG uptake. Results of other imaging examinations (MRI, CT, radiography), laboratory data, biopsies, and the clinical course were used for verification of detected lesions.

RESULTS. FDG PET was able to detect medullary involvement of multiple myeloma. There were two false-negative results. In one patient, the radiographic skeletal survey showed subcentimeter lytic lesions within the ribs that were not detected on FDG PET and in the other patient, a lytic lesion detected on radiographs showed only mildly increased FDG uptake that was not identified prospectively. There was one false-positive FDG PET result in a patient who had undergone radiation therapy 3 weeks before PET. FDG PET was helpful in differentiating between posttherapeutic changes and residual/recurrent tumor and in assessing response to therapy. FDG PET resulted in upstaging of disease in four patients, which influenced subsequent management and prognosis. Sensitivity of FDG PET in detecting myelomatous involvement was 85% and specificity was 92%.

CONCLUSION. FDG PET is able to detect bone marrow involvement in patients with multiple myeloma. FDG PET is useful in assessing extent of disease at time of initial diagnosis, contributing to staging that is more accurate. FDG PET is also useful for evaluating therapy response.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M HORGER, P PEREIRA, C D CLAUSSEN, L KANZ, R VONTHEIN, B DENECKE, and C DRIESSEN
Hyperattenuating bone marrow abnormalities in myeloma patients using whole-body non-enhanced low-dose MDCT: correlation with haematological parameters
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 81(965): 386 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
R. Fonti, B. Salvatore, M. Quarantelli, C. Sirignano, S. Segreto, F. Petruzziello, L. Catalano, R. Liuzzi, B. Rotoli, S. Del Vecchio, et al.
18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in Evaluation of Patients with Multiple Myeloma
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 195 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Ghesani, S. Goel, M. Meka, S. Cohen, A. Chang, and P. Maslin
Multiple Myeloma Presenting With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Avid Liver Lesions Diagnosed on Positron Emission Tomography Scan
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5319 - 5320.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. S. Steinbach
"MRI in the Detection of Malignant Infiltration of Bone Marrow"--A Commentary
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1443 - 1445.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
E. Zamagni, C. Nanni, F. Patriarca, E. Englaro, P. Castellucci, O. Geatti, P. Tosi, P. Tacchetti, D. Cangini, G. Perrone, et al.
A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
Haematologica, January 1, 2007; 92(1): 50 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Dankerl, P. Liebisch, G. Glatting, C. Friesen, N. M. Blumstein, D. Kocot, C. Wendl, D. Bunjes, and S. N. Reske
Multiple Myeloma: Molecular Imaging with 11C-Methionine PET/CT--Initial Experience
Radiology, December 19, 2006; (2006) 2422051980.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M Hoffmann, S Wohrer, A Becherer, A Chott, B Streubel, K Kletter, and M Raderer
18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue: histology makes the difference
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 1761 - 1765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.