HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Prologo, J. D. Articles by Cummings, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Prologo, J. D. Articles by Cummings, M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

The Effect of Single-Detector CT Versus MDCT on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Negative Results on CT Pulmonary Angiography

Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106.

OBJECTIVE. We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients in whom pulmonary embolism (PE) has been ruled out with single-detector CT versus MDCT, given the improved visualization of subsegmental clots with the latter and the recent increase in use of CT for evaluation of PE.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two cohorts of patients undergoing CT for suspected PE with either single-detector CT (3-mm collimation and pitch of 1.7) or MDCT (2-mm collimation and pitch of 1) scanners were prospectively observed and compared using predefined criteria for evidence of subsequent thromboembolic disease during the 6 months after the acquisition of their initial scan.

RESULTS. Ninety-eight patients were scanned using a single-detector CT scanner. Of these, none had evidence of subsequent PE or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and six (6.1%) died of unrelated causes. Of the 100 patients scanned using an MDCT scanner, one (1.0%) had a subsequent nonfatal PE 2 months after the initial scanning, one (1.0%) had DVT 1 month after the initial scanning, and eight (8.0%) died of unrelated causes. No significant difference was found in either the probability of subsequent thromboembolic events (² = 0.3183, degrees of freedom [df] = 1, p = 1) or frequency of unrelated deaths (² = 0.2655, df = 1, p = 0.7829) between patients scanned using single-detector CT or MDCT protocols.

CONCLUSION. Our results show that patients with suspected acute PE and negative CT results have acceptable clinical outcomes in the absence of anticoagulation treatment up to 6 months after acquisition of their initial scan. Furthermore, we found that the increased visualization of smaller, more peripheral arteries afforded by multislice technology did not affect clinical outcome.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Heyer, P. S. Mohr, S. P. Lemburg, S. A. Peters, and V. Nicolas Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 577 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R Desai Unsuspected pulmonary embolism on CT scanning: yet another headache for clinicians? Thorax, June 1, 2007; 62(6): 470 - 472. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Hogg, G Brown, J Dunning, J Wright, S Carley, B Foex, and K Mackway-Jones Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with CT pulmonary angiography: a systematic review Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 172 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]