HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bezerra, A. S. Articles by Ahmed, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bezerra, A. S. Articles by Ahmed, M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Determination of Splenomegaly by CT: Is There a Place for a Single Measurement?

¹ Universidade Católica de Brasília-Campus I, Curso de Medicina, EPCT QS 7 Lote 1, Taguatinga, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 71966-700.
² Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
³ Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to determine if there is a single parameter that can be used as a marker of splenomegaly using CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Splenic length, width, and thickness were measured in 249 CT scans and multidimensional indexes were obtained from the multiplication of these measurements. Volume was calculated by summing the volumes of multiple contiguous scans. The relationship of the spleen to the left liver lobe and inferior third of the left kidney was also evaluated. Linear equations were obtained to correlate each measurement to the splenic volume.

RESULTS. The unidimensional measurements with best correlation to volume were splenic length (r = 0.81, p < 0.01) and width (r = 0.804, p < 0.01). Correlation was better for the multidimensional indexes (r = 0.95, p < 0.01). Using a previously described upper limit of normality for splenic volume of 314.5 cm³ in the linear regression equation obtained, a maximum spleen length of 9.76 cm was the upper limit of normality. The relation of the lowest point of the spleen to the inferior third of the kidney also showed that if the spleen reached or extended below this portion of the kidney, it could be used as evidence of splenomegaly (p < 0.005), although it had a low sensitivity.

CONCLUSION. Splenic length and multidimensional indexes correlate well with splenic CT volume. A splenic length of 9.76 cm can be used to accurately diagnose splenomegaly and can replace multiple-measurement, time-consuming methods in the clinical routine.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. d. A. Bezerra, G. D'Ippolito, R. P. Caldana, D. D. Leopoldino, G. R. Batista, D. R. Borges, G. de Jesus Lopes Filho, and M. Ahmed Differentiating Cirrhosis and Chronic Hepatosplenic Schistosomiasis Using MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): W201 - W207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. J. Jeong, S. Kim, Y. D. Wook, J. W. Lee, K.-I. Kim, and S. H. Lee Scrub Typhus: Clinical, Pathologic, and Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 161 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Vilgrain, B. Condat, C. Bureau, A. Hakime, A. Plessier, D. Cazals-Hatem, and D. C. Valla Atrophy-Hypertrophy Complex in Patients with Cavernous Transformation of the Portal Vein: CT Evaluation Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 149 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]