AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Press Release
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulkens, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bellnick, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mulkens, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bellnick, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2005; 184:1611-1618
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Comparison of Effective Doses for Low-Dose MDCT and Radiographic Examination of Sinuses in Children

T. H. Mulkens1, C. Broers2, S. Fieuws3, J.-L. Termote1 and P. Bellnick1

1 Department of Radiology, Heilig Hart Hospital, Kolveniersvest 20, 2500 Lier, Belgium.
2 Department of Pediatrics, Heilig Hart Hospital, 2500 Lier, Belgium.
3 School of Public Health, Biostatistical Centre, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, University Hospital St. Rafael, Leuven, Belgium.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to show that in low-dose MDCT of the sinuses in children the effective dose can be lowered to a level comparable to that used for standard radiographic images, with resultant CT scans that are still of diagnostic image quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In standard radiographic examinations of sinuses (anteroposterior and lateral views) with 75 kV, 20 mAs, and 3-mm aluminum filtration in 69 children (mean age, 4.2 years), the dose-area-product (DAP; mGy x cm2) was measured and converted to effective dose (mSv) according to coefficients published by the British National Radiological Protection Board. Another group of 125 children (mean age, 6.8 years) underwent low-dose MDCT of the sinuses with 6- or 16-MDCT in two phases and with different scanning protocols. An effective dose for MDCT was calculated from conversion of the dose-length-product (DLP, mGy xm) according to age.

RESULTS. The mean effective dose (E) for standard radiography was 0.0528 mSv. The mean E value for low-dose MDCT was 0.096 mSv in the first phase of the study but could be lowered in the second phase to 0.0531 mSv by a combination of higher pitch and faster scan rotation time in our scan protocols, which results in diagnostic image quality at a very low dose. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in effective dose between radiography and MDCT of the second phase.

CONCLUSION. With modern MDCT technology, low-dose CT of the sinuses in children can yield diagnostic image quality using an effective dose comparable to that used for standard radiography.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
U.K. Udayasankar, K. Braithwaite, M. Arvaniti, D. Tudorascu, W.C. Small, S. Little, and S. Palasis
Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT Protocol for Follow-Up Evaluation of Children with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Reduction of Radiation and Effect on Image Quality
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 802 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Just da Costa e Silva and G. Alves Pontes da Silva
Eliminating Unenhanced CT When Evaluating Abdominal Neoplasms in Children
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1211 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.