AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blodgett, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Meltzer, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blodgett, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Meltzer, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 184:S138-S145
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Issues, Controversies, and Clinical Utility of Combined PET/CT Imaging: What Is the Interpreting Physician Facing?

Todd M. Blodgett1, Bethany Casagranda1, David W. Townsend1 and Carolyn C. Meltzer1,2

1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
2 Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

OBJECTIVE. This article identifies the most commonly encountered issues of combined PET/CT and shows the wide variability in perceived possible solutions to these issues. This article will serve as a catalyst to stimulate discussion between experts in both radiology and nuclear medicine.

CONCLUSION. Combining a PET tomography and CT scanner into a single unit amounts to advantages that are not merely additive, but synergistic. Even PET/CT skeptics will embrace the technology after becoming acquainted with the possibilities and will accept the reality that there is no return to PET only.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Z. Wong, E. K. Paulson, R. C. Nelson, E. F. Patz Jr., and R. E. Coleman
Practical Approach to Diagnostic CT Combined with PET
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 622 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Bruzzi, M. T. Truong, E. M. Marom, O. Mawlawi, D. A. Podoloff, H. A. Macapinlac, and R. F. Munden
Incidental Findings on Integrated PET/CT That Do Not Accumulate 18F-FDG
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1116 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.