AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masi, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Link, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masi, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Link, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2005; 184:1754-1761
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Optimization of Gadodiamide Concentration for MR Arthrography at 3 T

Jeffrey N. Masi, David Newitt, Christian A. Sell, Heike Daldrup-Link, Lynne Steinbach, Sharmila Majumdar and Thomas M. Link

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave., A 367, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the optimal concentration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (gadodiamide) for direct MR arthrography at 3 T compared with 1.5 T in an in vitro study.

CONCLUSION. Optimized concentrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents for MR arthrography are similar at 3 and 1.5 T, although a slightly greater dilution may be useful at 3 T. Signal-to-noise ratio peak levels are significantly reduced by adding an iodinated contrast agent, relatively significantly more at 3 T than at 1.5 T.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Porat, J. A. Leupold, K. R. Burnett, and W. M. Nottage
Reliability of Non-Imaging-Guided Glenohumeral Joint Injection Through Rotator Interval Approach in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic MR Arthrography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): W96 - W99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Andreisek, J. M. Froehlich, J. Hodler, D. Weishaupt, V. Beutler, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, C. Boesch, and D. Nanz
Direct MR Arthrography at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Signal Dependence on Gadolinium and Iodine Concentrations--Phantom Study
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 706 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Moser, J.-C. Dosch, A. Moussaoui, and J.-L. Dietemann
Wrist Ligament Tears: Evaluation of MRI and Combined MDCT and MR Arthrography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1278 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.