HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Teefey, S. A. Articles by Yamaguchi, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Teefey, S. A. Articles by Yamaguchi, K. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Detection and Measurement of Rotator Cuff Tears with Sonography: Analysis of Diagnostic Errors

¹ Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63110.
² Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62794.
³ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63110.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to analyze the causes of errors in the detection and measurement of rotator cuff tears in our patient population.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Seventy-one consecutive patients with shoulder pain who were prospectively studied with sonography had subsequent arthroscopy that showed a full-thickness or partial-thickness tear or intact cuff. For sonography and arthroscopy, the length or degree of retraction and width of a tear, when present, was recorded. When there were discrepant findings, representative images were jointly evaluated by the radiologist and orthopedic surgeon to determine the cause of the error.

RESULTS. Fifteen detection errors were found, including five misses (three < 5-mm subscapularis and two small partial-thickness tears), four errors inherent with the test (distinguishing large bursal side or extensive partial-thickness from full-thickness tears and tendinopathy from partial-thickness tears), three errors of an unknown cause, two due to misinterpretation, and one error inherent with the patient. Seventeen measurement errors occurred with full-thickness tears, 15 of those in patients with large or massive tears. Bursal thickening (n = 4), non-visualization of the torn tendon end (n = 2), nonretracted tear (n = 2), and complex tear (n = 1) contributed to the errors. Eight measurement errors occurred with partial-thickness tears. Difficulty distinguishing tendinopathy from partial-thickness tears (n = 3) and complex tears (n = 3) accounted for six errors.

CONCLUSION. Although infrequent, detection errors were due to limitations inherent with the test or misses. Limitations inherent with the patient and misinterpretation of the findings were rare. Most measurement errors occurred in patients with large or massive cuff tears.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Al-Shawi, R. Badge, and T. Bunker The detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears using ultrasound J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2008; 90-B(7): 889 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]