AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gervais, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gervais, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 185:72-80
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Part 2, Lessons Learned with Ablation of 100 Tumors

Debra A. Gervais1, Ronald S. Arellano1, Francis J. McGovern2, W. Scott McDougal2 and Peter R. Mueller1

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., White 270, Boston, MA 02114.
2 Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to review radiofrequency ablation of 100 renal tumors and lessons learned with respect to electrode approach, effects on collecting system, bowel proximity, and patterns of residual disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Over 6 years, 100 renal tumors in 85 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation. Images were reviewed to determine the following: effect of initial electrode approach at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface; effect of collecting system proximity to the tumor and to the zone of ablation; bowel proximity to the tumor and strategies to protect bowel; patterns of residual disease; and approaches at subsequent sessions.

RESULTS. The initial placement of the electrode at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface did not result in significantly fewer overlapping ablations (p = 0.91) or a lower rate of residual disease (p = 0.86). Direct contiguity of tumor or zone of ablation to the collecting system did not increase the complication rate. However, obscuration of calyces by a central tumor was a significant predictor of collecting system hemorrhage necessitating treatment (p < 0.001) seen in three of nine tumors obscuring calyces. Clinically significant urine leaks were rare (1/100) and related to downstream obstruction. There were no bowel complications despite the fact that 27 of the tumors were within 1 cm of bowel. Protective strategies progressed from reliance on electrode positioning to hydrodissection. Residual patterns were predominantly nodules or crescents, and straight electrodes were commonly used to approach residual disease.

CONCLUSION. Initial electrode position at and parallel to the tumor-kidney interface does not result in less difficult or more successful ablations. Contiguity of tumor or zone of ablation to the collecting system does not increase the risk of complications, but obscuration of calyces does. Bowel complications are rare, and protection with hydrodissection is becoming more common. Residual tumor presents as nodules or crescents of persistent enhancement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. S. Arellano, R. G. Garcia, D. A. Gervais, and P. R. Mueller
Percutaneous CT-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Efficacy of Organ Displacement by Injection of 5% Dextrose in Water Into the Retroperitoneum
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2009; 193(6): 1686 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. N. Uppot, S. G. Silverman, R. J. Zagoria, K. Tuncali, D. D. Childs, and D. A. Gervais
Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Primer of How We Do It
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1558 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. S. Davenport, E. M. Caoili, R. H. Cohan, J. H. Ellis, E. J. Higgins, J. Willatt, and G. A. Fox
MRI and CT Characteristics of Successfully Ablated Renal Masses: Imaging Surveillance After Radiofrequency Ablation
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1571 - 1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. D. Michaelson, O. Iliopoulos, D. F. McDermott, F. J. McGovern, M. G. Harisinghani, and E. Oliva
Case 17-2008 -- A 63-Year-Old Man with Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma
N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2008; 358(22): 2389 - 2396.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. E. Wile, J. R. Leyendecker, K. A. Krehbiel, R. B. Dyer, and R. J. Zagoria
CT and MR Imaging after Imaging-guided Thermal Ablation of Renal Neoplasms
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 325 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Kawamoto, S. Permpongkosol, D. A. Bluemke, E. K. Fishman, and S. B. Solomon
Sequential Changes after Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoablation of Renal Neoplasms: Role of CT and MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 343 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
D. P. Ryan
Nonsurgical Approaches to Colorectal Cancer
Oncologist, October 1, 2006; 11(9): 999 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Lucey
Radiofrequency ablation: the future is now.
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5 Suppl): S237 - S240.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.