|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie
514-8507, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Matsusaka Central Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie,
Japan.
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Matsusaka Central Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie,
Japan.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion MRI acquired with saturation-recovery prepared turbo fast low-angle shot (turbo FLASH) compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Recent studies show that first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI can provide noninvasive detection of low-limiting stenosis in the coronary artery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. First-pass contrast-enhanced MR images were acquired at rest and during stress in 40 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. All patients underwent thallium-201 SPECT without attenuation correction and coronary angiography. Two reviewers independently assigned one of five confidence grades without knowing the results of coronary angiography for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Luminal stenosis >70% on coronary angiography was used as a reference standard.
RESULTS. On coronary angiography, 70% or greater diameter stenosis of the coronary artery was observed in 21 (52.5%) of 40 patients. The areas under the ROC curve for detection of significant stenosis in the individual coronary artery were 0.86 (observer 1) and 0.84 (observer 2) for MRI. These values were 0.79 (observer 1, p = not significant) and 0.72 (observer 2, p = not significant) for 201Tl SPECT.
CONCLUSION. The diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion MRI acquired with saturation-recovery-prepared turbo FLASH was comparable with that of stress 201Tl SPECT. Stress first-pass contrast-enhanced MRI is a noninvasive technique that can be used as an alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Gebker, C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, S. Kelle, B. Schnackenburg, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Diagnostic Performance of Myocardial Perfusion MR at 3 T in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 57 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Courtney, N. R. Munce, K. J. Anderson, A. S. Thind, G. Leung, P. E. Radau, F. S. Foster, I. A. Vitkin, R. S. Schwartz, A. J. Dick, et al. Innovations in imaging for chronic total occlusions: a glimpse into the future of angiography's blind-spot Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2008; 29(5): 583 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Gerber MR perfusion imaging. What will be its impact for detection of coronary disease in the future? Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 434 - 435. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gebker, C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, B. Schnackenburg, S. Kozerke, A. Bornstedt, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel MR Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with k-Space and Time Broad-Use Linear Acquisition Speed-up Technique: Feasibility Study Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 863 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Nandalur, B. A. Dwamena, A. F. Choudhri, M. R. Nandalur, and R. C. Carlos Diagnostic Performance of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1343 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Costa, S. Shoemaker, H. Futamatsu, C. Klassen, D. J. Angiolillo, M. Nguyen, A. Siuciak, P. Gilmore, M. M. Zenni, L. Guzman, et al. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging Detects Anatomic and Physiologic Coronary Artery Disease as Measured by Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 7, 2007; 50(6): 514 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |