HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, J. K. Articles by Cho, K.-S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, J. K. Articles by Cho, K.-S. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Comparison of Virtual Cystoscopy, Multiplanar Reformation, and Source CT Images with Contrast Material-Filled Bladder for Detecting Lesions

¹ Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, South Korea.
² Department of Radiology, Inje University, Sanggyepaik Hospital, 761-1 Sanggye-7 dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-707, South Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reformation, and source CT images for lesion detection in the contrast material-filled bladder.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two observers independently evaluated 47 patients (28 men and 19 women; mean age ± SD, 59 ± 16 years) with virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reconstruction, and source CT images acquired with contrast material-filled bladder using an MDCT scanner (detector array, 4 x 1.25 mm; beam pitch, 0.75). Agreement between the two observers was evaluated for the three reconstruction methods using kappa statistics. Using the conventional cystoscopic findings as a reference, we compared the results of the three reconstruction techniques both by bladder site and by patient using the McNemar test.

RESULTS. The interobserver agreement for the number of positive sites was excellent for virtual cystoscopy ( = 0.816), fair for multiplanar reconstruction ( = 0.461), and good for source CT images = 0.676). For both observers, the sensitivity for lesion detection by bladder site was significantly greater with virtual cystoscopy (observer 1, 95%; observer 2, 90%) than with multiplanar reconstruction (78% and 60%) and source CT (68% and 65%) images (p < 0.05), whereas the specificity by bladder site and the sensitivity and specificity by patient did not differ with the three methods (p > 0.05). For determining the presence or absence of lesion at each site, virtual cystoscopy was more accurate than multiplanar reconstruction and source CT images for both observers (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION. Virtual cystoscopy is more accurate than multiplanar reconstruction and source CT images for the detection of lesions in the bladder.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kim, L. L. Wang, J. P. Heiken, C. L. Siegel, C. F. Hildebolt, and K. T. Bae Opacification of Urinary Bladder and Ureter at CT Urography: Effect of a Log-rolling Procedure and Postvoiding Residual Bladder Urine Volume Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 747 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Tsampoulas, A. C. Tsili, D. Giannakis, Y. Alamanos, N. Sofikitis, and S. C. Efremidis 16-MDCT Cystoscopy in the Evaluation of Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 729 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Park, J. K. Kim, H. J. Lee, H. J. Choi, and K.-S. Cho Hematuria: Portal Venous Phase Multi Detector Row CT of the Bladder A Prospective Study Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 798 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]