AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Eustace, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Eustace, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2005; 185:711-716
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Clinical Observations

A Comparison of Whole-Body MRI and CT for the Staging of Lymphoma

D. D. Brennan1,2, T. Gleeson1, L. E. Coate3, C. Cronin1, D. Carney3 and S. J. Eustace1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
2 Department of Radiology, Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Cappagh Hospital, Finglas, Dublin, Ireland 11.
3 Department of Oncology, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to compare whole-body MRI and CT for the staging of lymphoma.

CONCLUSION. Whole-body MRI represents an alternative to CT in the staging of lymphoma, with an ability to stage disease, identify lymph nodes greater than 1.2 cm, and the additional ability to evaluate for the presence or absence of disease spread to bone marrow. CT allows detection of more nodes (< 1.2 cm) than MRI but this does not alter tumor stage.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Domingues, M. P. Carneiro, F. C. R. Lopes, R. C. Domingues, L. M. B. da Fonseca, and E. L. Gasparetto
Whole-Body MRI and FDG PET Fused Images for Evaluation of Patients with Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 1012 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
K. Brauck, M. O. Zenge, F. M. Vogt, H. H. Quick, F. Stock, T. Trarbach, M. E. Ladd, and J. Barkhausen
Feasibility of Whole-Body MR with T2- and T1-weighted Real-time Steady-State Free Precession Sequences during Continuous Table Movement to Depict Metastases
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 910 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
T. C. Kwee, R. M. Kwee, and R. A. J. Nievelstein
Imaging in staging of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review
Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 504 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
A. Muntanola, F. Bosch, P. Arguis, E. Arellano-Rodrigo, C. Ayuso, E. Gine, M. Crespo, P. Abrisqueta, C. Moreno, F. Cobo, et al.
Abdominal Computed Tomography Predicts Progression in Patients With Rai Stage 0 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2007; 25(12): 1576 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.