AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishino, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishino, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. F., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1489
AJR 2005; 185:960-963
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Thickness of Molybdenum Filter and Squared Contrast-to-Noise Ratio per Dose for Digital Mammography

Thomas K. Nishino1, Xizeng Wu2 and Raleigh F. Johnson, Jr.1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 2.448 Clinical Sciences Bldg., 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0709.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to test whether the lesion-tissue contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at a given dose level can be improved by increasing the thickness of the molybdenum (Mo) filter currently used in digital mammography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We studied how the CNR between breast and a 5-mm simulated infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) embedded in a 5-cm-thick breast changes with Mo filter thickness. We performed phantom imaging experiments by modifying the filter wheel of a Senographe 2000D unit with Mo filters that ranged from 15 to 90 µm in thickness. A 5-cm-thick 50% glandular-50% adipose breast phantom with a 5-mm insert simulating IDC was used as the phantom for all the cases. The CNRs between the breast phantom and the IDC insert were measured, and average glandular doses were calculated using a filtration-dependent X-ray spectra model and a breast dosimetry model based on a validated Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS. The lesion-tissue CNR at a given dose level increases with increasing Mo filter thickness from 15 to 90 µm. The measured squared CNR per dose increased by 8%, 14%, 17%, and 17% for 45-, 60-, 75-, and 90-µm Mo filters, respectively, compared with the standard 30-µm Mo filter. Meanwhile, the exposure times were increased by 35% (45 µm), 71% (60 µm), 177% (75 µm), and 229% (90 µm).

CONCLUSION. Increasing Mo filter thickness from 30 to 60 µm can increase lesion-tissue squared CNR per dose by 14% with a tolerable increase in the duration of exposure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.